Re: CJK support in ConTeXt

[Idris S Hamid <ishamid@LAMAR.COLOSTATE.EDU>]

Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:

> Wednesday, August 27, 2003 Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> HH> At 12:37 27/08/2003 +0200, you wrote:
> >>(I hate replying to myself, but ...)
> >>
> >>Ok, since it seems that e-Omega is starting to get some "mass"
> >>interest, I'm thinking about setting up a mailing list for it.
> >>Maybe two, one for users and one for developers. Any
> >>suggestions on the listserver to use?
>
> HH> i can ask the ntg, since they host more lists, ok? you can mnage the list
> HH> with mailmanager
>
> AFAIK, the two "biggest" TeX mailing lists holders are ntg and
> tug; either is fine for me. Should I create two lists, or do
> you think that one list is enough?

FWIW, I think that one list is certainly enough. Looking at the Omega list I'm
not sure there was any real benefit in having two lists; we certainly don't need
to divide energies at this stage with two low-traffic lists.

Now when eOmega becomes a hit, we can adjust accordingly.


> Given the ideas on the name change (which will be factual with
> the first officially "stable" release, that is the one
> following RC2, probably) it's probably better to use aleph in
> the mailing list name. So:

BTW, since u and Hans seem to like my idea (and I'm cc'ing the others to see if
they object), is it official? Are we going with Aleph?

Best wishes
Idris