From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/14047 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thomas Schrader Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: How to nicely print XHTML to PDF Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 12:18:22 +0100 Sender: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Message-ID: <3FB4B9FE.4070103@web.de> Reply-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1068809160 11143 80.91.224.253 (14 Nov 2003 11:26:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 11:26:00 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Fri Nov 14 12:25:57 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AKc5N-0000Is-00 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 12:25:57 +0100 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18F6F10B36; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 12:25:54 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from mail2.aeccom.com (port-212-202-101-158.reverse.qsc.de [212.202.101.158]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59D8C10B2F for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 12:18:23 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from web.de (antero.core.aeccom.com [192.168.2.17]) by mail2.aeccom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1225030 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 12:18:23 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030703 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:14047 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:14047 Hi everybody, would you please put this right, if I'm mistaken. Isn't ConTeXt capable to typeset XML? And isn't it really simple to make XHTML from HTML? So, is there any obstacle against using ConTeXt as customizable quality-typesetting backend for (readjusted/simplyfied) (X)HTML pages? What about power/complexity? How to style output? I tried Gecko but it's not what I call user-friendly. What is your opinion? Kind regards Thomas Schrader -- mailto laborator at web de