[NTG-context] Re: unprotecting when defining in Lua

[Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context <ntg-context@ntg.nl>]

On 4/29/24 18:04, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
> Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context schrieb am 29.04.2024 um 17:22:
>> [...]
>> Which is the right way to use "interfaces.definecommand" to get a simple
>> command as in standard TeX?
>>
>> I mean, no a non \permanent or non \protected command.
>
> You can't create unprotected command with interfaces.definecommand
> but this not a problem because you can just use interfaces.implement
> to create your command which is then unprotected by default. Using
> implement instead of definecommand doesn't matter because
> definecommand is just a wrapper for the implement function with the
> option to create a environment.

Many thanks for your fast reply, Wolfgang.

I’m reading it now in cld-mkiv.pdf.

Is \protected the same as \unexpanded?

Many thanks for your help again,

Pablo
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl
webpage  : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror)
archive  : https://github.com/contextgarden/context
wiki     : https://wiki.contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________