From: Hans Hagen via ntg-context <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Cc: Hans Hagen <j.hagen@xs4all.nl>
Subject: Re: Setting table of contents depth by number rather than by list
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2021 01:00:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d808aa7-3be7-42bf-5548-6ac2d28f7e58@xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <585d8aea-8e50-e4c7-cb62-e9f62506fba0@gmail.com>
On 12/24/2021 5:45 PM, Jason Ross via ntg-context wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> Is it possible to set the maximum table of contents depth to a number
> rather than providing an explicit list of section names?
>
>
> Background:
>
> I am developing an exporter for Org mode. In Org, users can specify the
> number of levels they want in the table of contents with a number. I
> currently do this by having the sectioning commands be known to the
> exporter so I can generate a command like
> \setupcombinedlist
> [content]
> [list={section,subsection}]
> for n=2.
>
> I'm considering using \start/stopsectionlevel for sectioning commands
> instead. That way, users could add \definesectionlevels to the document
> preamble to use whatever sectioning scheme they wanted. However, this
> would mean that the exporter wouldn't know what sectioning commands to
> use the TOC setup.
given the amount of reactions i added a simple levels feature ... the
best i can do for now is:
\placelist[chapter,section,subsection][levels=2]
keep in mind that all should work with the already present selective
placement and filtering (criterium)
uploaded
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-25 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-24 16:45 Jason Ross via ntg-context
2021-12-24 17:42 ` Denis Maier via ntg-context
2021-12-24 17:49 ` Denis Maier via ntg-context
2021-12-24 17:53 ` Jason Ross via ntg-context
2021-12-24 21:13 ` Denis Maier via ntg-context
2021-12-24 21:20 ` Denis Maier via ntg-context
2021-12-24 21:22 ` Jason Ross via ntg-context
2021-12-24 21:29 ` Denis Maier via ntg-context
2021-12-24 21:37 ` Jason Ross via ntg-context
2021-12-24 21:43 ` Denis Maier via ntg-context
2021-12-24 21:48 ` Denis Maier via ntg-context
2021-12-24 21:55 ` Jason Ross via ntg-context
2021-12-24 23:35 ` Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context
2021-12-25 0:00 ` Hans Hagen via ntg-context [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3d808aa7-3be7-42bf-5548-6ac2d28f7e58@xs4all.nl \
--to=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
--cc=j.hagen@xs4all.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).