From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/30489 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Pepe Barbe" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Recapitulating Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:01:13 -0500 Message-ID: <3e73596b0608241301o6f6aad1dg37172461694b3231@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1156449747 17182 80.91.229.2 (24 Aug 2006 20:02:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 20:02:27 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Thu Aug 24 22:02:23 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GGLOZ-0002Hr-Ir for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 22:01:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E4951FF2E; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 22:01:40 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 31344-04; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 22:01:31 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CC3E1FF05; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 22:01:31 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F3CC1FF05 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 22:01:27 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 31392-02 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 22:01:17 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.198]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 0272B1FF04 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 22:01:15 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 13so486730nzp for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:01:14 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.35.37.18 with SMTP id p18mr3376540pyj; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:01:14 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.35.83.11 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:01:13 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: "mailing list for ConTeXt users" Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:30489 Archived-At: After jumping through hoops, with some help I managed to get XeTeX running and using TTF fonts directly with pdfTeX. But before I go any further I would like to know what is your opinion in using one or the other. When researching a bit on XeTeX I read there were several caveates vs. using pdfTeX with LaTeX. Is this the same? In ConTeXt. What can I expect to work and what not? If TTF can be used with pdfTeX (with some effort) what is the advantage of using XeTeX with ConTeXt? Thanks, Pepe