* loss of references after changing page arrangement
@ 2004-06-07 19:21 R. Ermers
2004-06-08 18:35 ` Hans Hagen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: R. Ermers @ 2004-06-07 19:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 195 bytes --]
Hi Contexers,
Does anyone know why I lose all my references to sections (\in[abc]) and pages (\at[abc]) when I specify a smaller page arrangement, e.g. 2*2?
Kind regards,
Robert Ermers
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 828 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: loss of references after changing page arrangement
2004-06-07 19:21 loss of references after changing page arrangement R. Ermers
@ 2004-06-08 18:35 ` Hans Hagen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Hans Hagen @ 2004-06-08 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
R. Ermers wrote:
> Hi Contexers,
>
> Does anyone know why I lose all my references to sections (\in[abc])
> and pages (\at[abc]) when I specify a smaller page arrangement, e.g. 2*2?
did you use --arrange when processing the document ? you need to make
sure that the utility file is not overwritten
Hans
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-06-08 18:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-06-07 19:21 loss of references after changing page arrangement R. Ermers
2004-06-08 18:35 ` Hans Hagen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).