From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/15848 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Re: itemize Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:47:45 +0200 Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Message-ID: <4107A071.9010302@wxs.nl> References: <40D47482.9060401@boede.nl> <7A02B152-C35E-11D8-BAAC-00039318D414@uni-bonn.de> <40D706A5.8030809@iname.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1091019093 30027 80.91.224.253 (28 Jul 2004 12:51:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:51:33 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Wed Jul 28 14:51:14 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bpntq-0007wa-00 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:51:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BB7C1277A; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:51:14 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 17116-06; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:51:13 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A84241276B; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:47:49 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6586C1276B for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:47:48 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 17101-04 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:47:47 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mailrelay02.solcon.nl (unknown [212.45.32.200]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2A63126F8 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:47:47 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from server-1.pragma-net.nl (dsl-212-84-128-085.solcon.nl [212.84.128.85]) by mailrelay02.solcon.nl (8.12.11/SQL-8.12.11-5/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6SCliNr004024 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:47:45 +0200 Original-Received: by server-1.pragma-net.nl (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 7110E1B39D; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:47:46 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from [10.100.1.191] (unknown [10.100.1.191]) by server-1.pragma-net.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B2861856D for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:47:45 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl In-Reply-To: <40D706A5.8030809@iname.com> X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.75, clamav-milter version 0.75 on mailrelay02 X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:15848 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:15848 Gary Pajer wrote: > Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: > >> Me stupid! Willi, this message made my day. I've been using ConTeXt >> for more than a year now, but I was never able to figure out what >> setupitemize [.1.] .1. number each meant. So it's the level of >> itemization. Thanks, that should make things easier. And many thanks >> to Patrick and to you for pointing out the left= option. ConTeXt and >> the number of options it gives never cease to amaze me! > > > since we're back on the topic of itemize, I'll repost a question that > I've posted here before: > > ----------------------------------------------------- > > It seems to me that the 'before' and 'after' keywords used in the third > argument of \setupitemize are operative only if 'columns' are also > specified. In the example below, the hairlines disappear if the > 'columns' > keyword is eliminated. > > > Feature, bug, or misunderstanding? a bit of all, this will take me some time (maybe when i redo the item environment); has to do with grouping and such as well as before/after handling (compare output with\chardef\autoitemgroupspacing=0 set) > > BTW: can the lengths of the two hairlines in this example be made to be > the same length? What's causing the indentation of the first hairline? a bit tricky: par's (\endgraf's interfere in such matters, i.e. you need to invoke the command when the width is (still) known) \setupitemize [2] [a,packed,columns] [before={\thinrule\endgraf}, after={\endgraf\thinrule}]