Re: Best source of ConTeXt documentation?

[Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl>]

Paulo Ney de Souza wrote:

>This is one of the sore points of ConTeXt and of the development
>  
>
i addition to patricks remarks:

- it would take a lot of effort to keep such a source code repository up 
to date and in sync (else too many questions) with the pdf repositoty
- we only publish documented sources
- i want to stimulate users to writ etheir own styles not to mimick 
existing ones (i.e. avoid the 'all tex files look the same' problem)
- also: most examples in manuals are typeset using

\startbuffer
...
\stopbuffer

\typebuffer \getbuffer

so ... there are no hidden tricks (unless it would bother/confuse 
users); and .. things like cover designs i wanna keep for myself if only 
to avoid cutting and pasting

in due time, probably more sources will go on line, but only when i have 
a system/method of keeping things in sync; i don't like the idea to go 
on-line for each change that i want to make (we only have dsl for half a 
year, before that i had to do all on 64 lines which is no fun)

Hans