From: Peter Rolf <indiego@gmx.net>
Subject: Re: first element in radio field
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 14:52:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4163EA9F.8030105@gmx.net> (raw)
Moin!
First of all thanx to Hans and Willi for testing. It seems that I have to
update my (pdf)etex to a newer version. No bug: lucky Hans, unlucky me ;)
Willi Egger wrote:
> Hi Peter
>
> I tried your example wit the alpha version:
> This is pdfeTeXk, Version 3.141592-1.11a-2.1 (Web2c 7.5.2)
> ...
> ConTeXt ver: 2004.10.1 fmt: 2004.10.2 int: english mes: english
>
> Indentation as mentioned in your mail I can not see. -- however there
> are three things I do not really understand:
>
> 1. Though the frames are turned off for the unselected buttons, there
> are left and righthand lines along the buttonboxes.
a result of \showmakeup (struts?)
> 2. When pointing on the first botton it turns correctly into the gray
> area but with changing the text into "InAreaX", but this text can not
> be selected in order to have it remaining.
the names are not well choosen....
the prefix "X" in the button name means, that this button is inactive
(X-ing off);
only one button can be active in a radio field
> 3 When clicking on the second button the contents of the first butten
> changes into the value "NormalX" ...
>
> May be I do not get the idea of the radio-button ...
>
maybe this is not a good example for learning radio fields :)
> Willi
>
> Hans Hagen wrote:
>
>> Peter Rolf wrote:
>>
>>> Hello all!
>>>
>>> This is my first attempt with fields, so I am not sure if this is a bug
>>> in context or my fault :)
>>> Anyway, the first element of my radio field is indented, while the
>>> following
>>> elements are ok. This is the case in horizontal and vertical
>>> arrangment.
>>> I added a minimal example...
>>>
>>> ConTeXt ver: 2004.10.1 fmt: 2004.10.3 int: english mes: german
>>> systems : pdfTeX version 111 -> please update
>>> systems : eTeX version 201 -> too old (bugs)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> it looks ok here, do others have the same problem?
>>
>> (\showmakeup may not be that handy in such cases)
>>
>> > \noindent
>> > \vbox{%
>> > \field[Button1]
>> > \field[Button2]
>> > \field[Button3]
>> > }
>>
>>
>> may better be:
>>
>> \noindent \vbox{\forgetall ....}
>
>
.....
Greetings,
Peter
next reply other threads:[~2004-10-06 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-06 12:52 Peter Rolf [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-10-04 11:50 Peter Rolf
2004-10-05 16:19 ` Hans Hagen
2004-10-05 19:00 ` Willi Egger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4163EA9F.8030105@gmx.net \
--to=indiego@gmx.net \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).