From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/16603 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Peter Rolf Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: first element in radio field Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 14:52:47 +0200 Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Message-ID: <4163EA9F.8030105@gmx.net> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1097133608 16722 80.91.229.6 (7 Oct 2004 07:20:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 07:20:08 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Thu Oct 07 09:19:56 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CFSZA-0008Iz-00 for ; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 09:19:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C53912789; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 09:19:55 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 10033-03-3; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 09:19:51 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B26E61277F; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 09:19:51 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1487A1277B for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 15:00:46 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 03870-04 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 15:00:45 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net (unknown [213.165.64.20]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id A33A11278A for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 14:57:24 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: (qmail 1544 invoked by uid 65534); 6 Oct 2004 12:57:23 -0000 Original-Received: from c-134-124-99.d.dial.de.ignite.net (EHLO [62.134.124.99]) (62.134.124.99) by mail.gmx.net (mp011) with SMTP; 06 Oct 2004 14:57:23 +0200 X-Authenticated: #24293357 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 09:19:51 +0200 X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:16603 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:16603 Moin! First of all thanx to Hans and Willi for testing. It seems that I have to update my (pdf)etex to a newer version. No bug: lucky Hans, unlucky me ;) Willi Egger wrote: > Hi Peter > > I tried your example wit the alpha version: > This is pdfeTeXk, Version 3.141592-1.11a-2.1 (Web2c 7.5.2) > ... > ConTeXt ver: 2004.10.1 fmt: 2004.10.2 int: english mes: english > > Indentation as mentioned in your mail I can not see. -- however there > are three things I do not really understand: > > 1. Though the frames are turned off for the unselected buttons, there > are left and righthand lines along the buttonboxes. a result of \showmakeup (struts?) > 2. When pointing on the first botton it turns correctly into the gray > area but with changing the text into "InAreaX", but this text can not > be selected in order to have it remaining. the names are not well choosen.... the prefix "X" in the button name means, that this button is inactive (X-ing off); only one button can be active in a radio field > 3 When clicking on the second button the contents of the first butten > changes into the value "NormalX" ... > > May be I do not get the idea of the radio-button ... > maybe this is not a good example for learning radio fields :) > Willi > > Hans Hagen wrote: > >> Peter Rolf wrote: >> >>> Hello all! >>> >>> This is my first attempt with fields, so I am not sure if this is a bug >>> in context or my fault :) >>> Anyway, the first element of my radio field is indented, while the >>> following >>> elements are ok. This is the case in horizontal and vertical >>> arrangment. >>> I added a minimal example... >>> >>> ConTeXt ver: 2004.10.1 fmt: 2004.10.3 int: english mes: german >>> systems : pdfTeX version 111 -> please update >>> systems : eTeX version 201 -> too old (bugs) >> >> >> >> >> it looks ok here, do others have the same problem? >> >> (\showmakeup may not be that handy in such cases) >> >> > \noindent >> > \vbox{% >> > \field[Button1] >> > \field[Button2] >> > \field[Button3] >> > } >> >> >> may better be: >> >> \noindent \vbox{\forgetall ....} > > ..... Greetings, Peter