* nath and \(start|stop)formula
@ 2004-11-14 18:17 Nikolai Weibull
2004-11-15 16:15 ` Christopher Creutzig
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Nikolai Weibull @ 2004-11-14 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hi!
I just began testing the 2.99.1.20041026 release of tetex and nath is
acting up. In the following document, the first math-formula works
fine, but the second one (display) doesn't:
\usemodule[nath]
\starttext
$A = (B, C, D, E)$
\placeformula
\startformula
A = (B, C, D, E)
\stopformula
\stoptext
! Undefined control sequence.
l.6 A = (
B, C, D, E)
? X
Any ideas? I'm guessing that the activation of ( messes something up.
If ( is changed to \{, the first , (after B) gives the same error.
If I use $$ ... $$ instead of \startformula ... \stopformula, it seems
to work fine though.
nikolai
--
::: name: Nikolai Weibull :: aliases: pcp / lone-star / aka :::
::: born: Chicago, IL USA :: loc atm: Gothenburg, Sweden :::
::: page: www.pcppopper.org :: fun atm: gf,lps,ruby,lisp,war3 :::
main(){printf(&linux["\021%six\012\0"],(linux)["have"]+"fun"-97);}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: nath and \(start|stop)formula
2004-11-14 18:17 nath and \(start|stop)formula Nikolai Weibull
@ 2004-11-15 16:15 ` Christopher Creutzig
2004-11-15 22:18 ` Nikolai Weibull
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Creutzig @ 2004-11-15 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
> \usemodule[nath]
> \starttext
> $A = (B, C, D, E)$
> \placeformula
> \startformula
> A = (B, C, D, E)
> \stopformula
> \stoptext
>
> ! Undefined control sequence.
> l.6 A = (
> B, C, D, E)
> ? X
Try \startnathequation ... \stopnathequation instead. Or patch
t-nath.tex for the same effect, I have (but this might have side-effects):
\let\nath!startformula\startformula
\let\nath!stopformula\stopformula
\def\startnathequation{%
\begingroup
\curr@cr@is@wall@cr
\nath!startformula
\startnatheq
\hbox\bgroup
\dmathon@
\wall\mathopen{}%
}
\def\stopnathequation{%
\return
\dmathoff@
\egroup
\stopnatheq
\nath!stopformula
\endgroup
}
\let\startformula\startnathequation
\let\stopformula\stopnathequation
regards,
Christopher Creutzig
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: nath and \(start|stop)formula
2004-11-15 16:15 ` Christopher Creutzig
@ 2004-11-15 22:18 ` Nikolai Weibull
2004-11-16 18:34 ` Re[2]: " Giuseppe Bilotta
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Nikolai Weibull @ 2004-11-15 22:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
* Christopher Creutzig <christopher@creutzig.de> [Nov 15, 2004 17:20]:
> Try \startnathequation ... \stopnathequation instead.
Ah, thanks. Is there still a way to get unnumbered equations?
nikolai
--
::: name: Nikolai Weibull :: aliases: pcp / lone-star / aka :::
::: born: Chicago, IL USA :: loc atm: Gothenburg, Sweden :::
::: page: www.pcppopper.org :: fun atm: gf,lps,ruby,lisp,war3 :::
main(){printf(&linux["\021%six\012\0"],(linux)["have"]+"fun"-97);}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re[2]: nath and \(start|stop)formula
2004-11-15 22:18 ` Nikolai Weibull
@ 2004-11-16 18:34 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2004-11-16 19:19 ` Tobias Burnus
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Giuseppe Bilotta @ 2004-11-16 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
Monday, November 15, 2004 Nikolai Weibull wrote:
> * Christopher Creutzig <christopher@creutzig.de> [Nov 15, 2004 17:20]:
>> Try \startnathequation ... \stopnathequation instead.
> Ah, thanks. Is there still a way to get unnumbered equations?
> nikolai
Do not put \placeformula before the equation :)
--
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: nath and \(start|stop)formula
2004-11-16 18:34 ` Re[2]: " Giuseppe Bilotta
@ 2004-11-16 19:19 ` Tobias Burnus
2004-11-16 20:29 ` "[" at beginning of formula ? Matthias Weber
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Tobias Burnus @ 2004-11-16 19:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hallo,
Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
>>>Try \startnathequation ... \stopnathequation instead.
>>>
>>>
>>Ah, thanks. Is there still a way to get unnumbered equations?
>>
>>
>Do not put \placeformula before the equation :)
>
>
Well, that changes a bit the spacing, how about \placeformula[-] ?
Tobias
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* "[" at beginning of formula ?
2004-11-16 19:19 ` Tobias Burnus
@ 2004-11-16 20:29 ` Matthias Weber
2004-11-16 21:26 ` h h extern
2004-11-17 10:35 ` Otared Kavian
0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Matthias Weber @ 2004-11-16 20:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hello,
I'd like to typeset
[\partial,B]=0
but
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula
0= [ A ,B ] = 0
\stopformula
gives just "=0"
(see below)
while
\stoptext
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula
0= [ A ,B ]
\stopformula
\stoptext
works. What is the meaning of [ at the beginning of a formula,
and how do I get rid of it?
Matthias
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: "[" at beginning of formula ?
2004-11-16 20:29 ` "[" at beginning of formula ? Matthias Weber
@ 2004-11-16 21:26 ` h h extern
2004-11-16 21:33 ` Matthias Weber
2004-11-17 10:35 ` Otared Kavian
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: h h extern @ 2004-11-16 21:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
Matthias Weber wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to typeset
> [\partial,B]=0
>
> but
>
> \starttext
> \placeformula
> \startformula
> 0= [ A ,B ] = 0
> \stopformula
>
>
> gives just "=0"
> (see below)
> while
>
> \stoptext
>
> \starttext
> \placeformula
> \startformula
> 0= [ A ,B ]
> \stopformula
> \stoptext
>
>
> works. What is the meaning of [ at the beginning of a formula,
> and how do I get rid of it?
there is a forward scan for [ ] i.e. a reference
just put a \relax in front of your intentional [
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: "[" at beginning of formula ?
2004-11-16 21:26 ` h h extern
@ 2004-11-16 21:33 ` Matthias Weber
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Matthias Weber @ 2004-11-16 21:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
Thanks!
Matthias
On Nov 16, 2004, at 4:26 PM, h h extern wrote:
> Matthias Weber wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I'd like to typeset
>> [\partial,B]=0
>> but
>> \starttext
>> \placeformula
>> \startformula
>> 0= [ A ,B ] = 0
>> \stopformula
>> gives just "=0"
>> (see below)
>> while
>> \stoptext
>> \starttext
>> \placeformula
>> \startformula
>> 0= [ A ,B ]
>> \stopformula
>> \stoptext
>> works. What is the meaning of [ at the beginning of a formula,
>> and how do I get rid of it?
>
> there is a forward scan for [ ] i.e. a reference
>
> just put a \relax in front of your intentional [
>
> Hans
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
> Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
> tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
> | www.pragma-pod.nl
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> ntg-context mailing list
> ntg-context@ntg.nl
> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: "[" at beginning of formula ?
2004-11-16 20:29 ` "[" at beginning of formula ? Matthias Weber
2004-11-16 21:26 ` h h extern
@ 2004-11-17 10:35 ` Otared Kavian
2004-11-17 12:57 ` Matthias Weber
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Otared Kavian @ 2004-11-17 10:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 375 bytes --]
At 15:29 -0500 16/11/04, Matthias Weber wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I'd like to typeset
>[\partial,B]=0
Hi Matthias,
Despite Hans' suggestion of putting \relax in front of [, in my
installation of ConTeXt this works well:
\starttext
\startformula
0 =[\partial,B] =0.
\stopformula
Make sure there is no funny invisible characters in front of the
square brackets.
Best regards: OK
[-- Attachment #1.1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 920 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #1.2: commutator.pdf --]
[-- Type: application/pdf, Size: 8174 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 139 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: "[" at beginning of formula ?
2004-11-17 10:35 ` Otared Kavian
@ 2004-11-17 12:57 ` Matthias Weber
2004-11-17 13:38 ` Otared Kavian
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Matthias Weber @ 2004-11-17 12:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hi Otared,
the actual problem arises with
\starttext
\startformula
[A,B] =0.
\stopformula
\stoptext
or, even worse, with
\starttext
\startformula
[\partial,B] =0.
\stopformula
\stoptext
Hans' solution is to use \relax whenever one has a [ at the beginning
of a formula:
\starttext
\startformula
\relax
[\partial,B] =0.
\stopformula
\stoptext
Matthias
On Nov 17, 2004, at 5:35 AM, Otared Kavian wrote:
> At 15:29 -0500 16/11/04, Matthias Weber wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to typeset
> [\partial,B]=0
>
> Hi Matthias,
>
> Despite Hans' suggestion of putting \relax in front of [, in my
> installation of ConTeXt this works well:
> \starttext
> \startformula
> 0 =[\partial,B] =0.
> \stopformula
>
> <image.tiff>Make sure there is no funny invisible characters in front
> of the square brackets.
>
> Best regards: OK
> <commutator.pdf>_______________________________________________
> ntg-context mailing list
> ntg-context@ntg.nl
> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: "[" at beginning of formula ?
2004-11-17 12:57 ` Matthias Weber
@ 2004-11-17 13:38 ` Otared Kavian
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Otared Kavian @ 2004-11-17 13:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
At 7:57 -0500 17/11/04, Matthias Weber wrote:
>Hi Otared,
>
>the actual problem arises with
>\starttext
> \startformula
>[A,B] =0.
> \stopformula
>\stoptext
>
>or, even worse, with
>
>\starttext
> \startformula
>[\partial,B] =0.
> \stopformula
>\stoptext
Hi Matthias,
Yes are right, indeed...
However I tried the following which works as well (replacing \relax
with empty braces {}):
\starttext
\startformula
{}[\partial,B] =0.
\stopformula
and
\startformula
{}[A,B] =0.
\stopformula
\stoptext
Best regards: OK
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-11-17 13:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-11-14 18:17 nath and \(start|stop)formula Nikolai Weibull
2004-11-15 16:15 ` Christopher Creutzig
2004-11-15 22:18 ` Nikolai Weibull
2004-11-16 18:34 ` Re[2]: " Giuseppe Bilotta
2004-11-16 19:19 ` Tobias Burnus
2004-11-16 20:29 ` "[" at beginning of formula ? Matthias Weber
2004-11-16 21:26 ` h h extern
2004-11-16 21:33 ` Matthias Weber
2004-11-17 10:35 ` Otared Kavian
2004-11-17 12:57 ` Matthias Weber
2004-11-17 13:38 ` Otared Kavian
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).