From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/18211 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Vit Zyka Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: iso latin 2 Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 22:34:13 +0100 Message-ID: <420A81D5.702@seznam.cz> References: <420A4861.4020706@wxs.nl> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1107984851 17415 80.91.229.2 (9 Feb 2005 21:34:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 21:34:11 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Wed Feb 09 22:34:11 2005 Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CyzSw-0002bP-N8 for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 22:33:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE68212783; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 22:35:18 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 22276-01; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 22:35:18 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4544112780; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 22:33:31 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D904C12780 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 22:33:29 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 22001-05 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 22:33:29 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from smtp.seznam.cz (smtp.seznam.cz [212.80.76.43]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id E462B12775 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 22:33:28 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: (qmail 26042 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2005 21:33:28 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (vit.zyka@82.142.74.35) by smtp.seznam.cz with SMTP; 9 Feb 2005 21:33:28 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users In-Reply-To: <420A4861.4020706@wxs.nl> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0505-0, 31.01.2005), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-MailScanner-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-MailScanner-To: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:18211 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:18211 Hans Hagen wrote: > I wonder, > > \definecharacter Aring {\ilencodedrA} > > \definecharacter Lstroke {\ilencodedL} > \definecharacter lstroke {\ilencodedl} > > where do these come from? is that because csr does not provide those > glyphs? il2 encoding is not ISO-8859-2 but encoding of CS fonts (csr...). It was derived from ISOO-8859-2 but: - first 128 glyphs are the same as cmr... - upper part is added according to ISO-8859-2 (http://nl.ijs.si/gnusl/cee/charset.html) but only chars needed for Czech/Slovak lang. Neither Aring is present in CSfont, nor Lstroke, nor lstroke. > (which makes il2 like aer (almoet ec) something almost il2 -) I have mentioned that when I was interested in CMAP. --- I entered these three chars definitions when I was preparing support for Storm's fonts last weekend. It is a large collection (about 50 families) of commercial fonts with large glyph set each (about 370). Since there are prepared large collectin of tfm (t1 or il2 + one extended) from Petr Olsak I decided to use them. I prepared enco-st2.tex (storm il2) and enco-st3.tex (storm extended) for now (I intended also enco-st1 for t1). The question is how to elegantly switch from standard (st2) tfm to extended (st3) tfm when the glyph is not present in st2 - with preserving \rm, \bf, \it, \bi. Example: {\bf Bold text with special char \textplus} where \texplus is bold variant from st3 encoded tfm. It is understandable? Vit