From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/18216 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: iso latin 2 Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 23:21:19 +0100 Message-ID: <420A8CDF.1000406@wxs.nl> References: <420A4861.4020706@wxs.nl> <420A81D5.702@seznam.cz> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1107987728 30810 80.91.229.2 (9 Feb 2005 22:22:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 22:22:08 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Wed Feb 09 23:22:08 2005 Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cz0Bi-0002Kq-GU for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 23:20:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03BCE127CF; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 23:21:32 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 23019-01-6; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 23:21:29 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C80DA127C1; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 23:21:29 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF3C127C1 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 23:21:28 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 23019-01-5 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 23:21:27 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from mailrelay01.solcon.nl (maillb.solcon.nl [212.45.32.200]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55F6412780 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 23:21:27 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from server-1.pragma-net.nl (dsl-212-84-128-085.solcon.nl [212.84.128.85]) by mailrelay01.solcon.nl (8.12.11/SQL-8.12.11-5/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j19MLEMH019070; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 23:21:14 +0100 Original-Received: by server-1.pragma-net.nl (Postfix, from userid 65534) id E89BB17B42; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 23:11:21 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from [10.100.1.191] (unknown [10.100.1.191]) by server-1.pragma-net.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8570817B36; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 22:11:20 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users In-Reply-To: <420A81D5.702@seznam.cz> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.80/699/Thu Feb 3 03:53:35 2005 clamav-milter version 0.80j on mailrelay01 X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-MailScanner-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-MailScanner-To: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:18216 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:18216 Vit Zyka wrote: > Hans Hagen wrote: > >> I wonder, >> >> \definecharacter Aring {\ilencodedrA} >> >> \definecharacter Lstroke {\ilencodedL} >> \definecharacter lstroke {\ilencodedl} >> >> where do these come from? is that because csr does not provide those >> glyphs? > > > il2 encoding is not ISO-8859-2 but encoding of CS fonts (csr...). It was > derived from ISOO-8859-2 but: > - first 128 glyphs are the same as cmr... > - upper part is added according to ISO-8859-2 > (http://nl.ijs.si/gnusl/cee/charset.html) but only chars needed for > Czech/Slovak lang. > > Neither Aring is present in CSfont, nor Lstroke, nor lstroke. > >> (which makes il2 like aer (almoet ec) something almost il2 -) > > > I have mentioned that when I was interested in CMAP. > > --- > > I entered these three chars definitions when I was preparing support for > Storm's fonts last weekend. It is a large collection (about 50 families) > of commercial fonts with large glyph set each (about 370). Since there > are prepared large collectin of tfm (t1 or il2 + one extended) from Petr > Olsak I decided to use them. I prepared enco-st2.tex (storm il2) and > enco-st3.tex (storm extended) for now (I intended also enco-st1 for t1). > The question is how to elegantly switch from standard (st2) tfm to > extended (st3) tfm when the glyph is not present in st2 - with > preserving \rm, \bf, \it, \bi. > > Example: {\bf Bold text with special char \textplus} where \texplus is > bold variant from st3 encoded tfm. It is understandable? I wonder, why don't you use the more recent qx encoding; if il2 is only used for csr, then we can best extend il2 encoding since all the chars missing in csr are present in latin modern; Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------