Re: iso latin 2

[Vit Zyka <vit.zyka@seznam.cz>]

Hans Hagen wrote:
> Vit Zyka wrote:
> 
>> ) I feel stronger and stronger that csr should coexist with lm for 
>> future. Perhaps like a option (not present in minimal distr?), but 
>> with full functionality if extra loaded.
> 
> 
> about how many to be czechified chars are we talking?

About 33 Czech glyphs (+5 or 7 more Slovak).

>> So I would like il2 will be preserved as it is and new coding 
>> according to lm (ISO-8859-2 ?) would be introduce (enco-l2 ?).
> 
> 
> how about il2 as input encoding and another one for the fonts?

Yes. True is that ISO-8859-2 is a correct input regime. So far il2 is 
more font-specific coding (*.enc). We can discuss their names.

If we change il2 regime to ISO... AFAIK we have to prepare new
- set of csr.enc, csr1.enc, csin.enc, and cstt.enc
- map file
- metric files cs*.tfm
If we preserve \enableregime[il2] and prepare \enableregime[l2] or 
something like, all no additional work and backward compatibility 
problems occure? Am I right?

vit