ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl>
Subject: Re: No performance improvement under OS X with new beta?
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 18:24:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <422899D9.1040305@wxs.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <413b3ca978e6f281d4843dad4a11bc58@indiana.edu>

Matthias Weber wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> after the recent discussion of ConTeXt processing (some) files 4 times 
> as often under OS X
> than elsewhere, I decided to upgrade to the most recent beta and run a 
> speed comparison
> on notes I am writing. To my dismay, here are the results:
> 
> Old version:
> 
> ConTeXt  ver: 2004.11.23  fmt: 2004.12.16
> TeXExec 5.2.3
> 
> total run time : 324 seconds
> 
> 
> New version:
> 
> ConTeXt  ver: 2005.03.02  fmt: 2005.3.4
>  total run time : 416 seconds
> 
> And I was hoping for a speed increase by a factor of 4 :(
> (I renamed the TeX source for both runs)
> 
> Of course I am completely ignorant about the internals, but at least
> I didn't expect that it would run slower.

how many runs?

normally context only becomes faster, so i wonder why it is so much slower

did you compare the logs?

Hans

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
      tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                              | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-03-04 17:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-04 13:44 ConTeXt-updater i-Package updated Steffen Wolfrum
2005-03-04 13:49 ` Mark Smith
2005-03-04 15:58   ` OSX ConTeXt users inventory (was: ConTeXt-updater i-Package updated) Maurice Diamantini
2005-03-04 16:03   ` ConTeXt-updater i-Package updated David Wooten
2005-03-04 16:29     ` Thomas A.Schmitz
2005-03-04 19:50       ` Alan Bowen
2005-03-04 21:43         ` Steve Peter
2005-03-05  9:31           ` h h extern
2005-03-04 16:48     ` Adam Lindsay
2005-03-04 17:13       ` No performance improvement under OS X with new beta? Matthias Weber
2005-03-04 17:20         ` Adam Lindsay
2005-03-04 18:35           ` Matthias Weber
2005-03-04 19:33             ` Adam Lindsay
2005-03-05  9:17               ` h h extern
2005-03-04 17:24         ` Hans Hagen [this message]
2005-03-04 18:43           ` Matthias Weber
2005-03-05  9:20             ` h h extern
2005-03-09  8:09         ` Patrick Gundlach
2005-03-04 14:07 ` ConTeXt-updater i-Package updated Gerben Wierda
2005-03-04 20:13 No performance improvement under OS X with new beta? Steffen Wolfrum
2005-03-05  9:15 ` h h extern

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=422899D9.1040305@wxs.nl \
    --to=pragma@wxs.nl \
    --cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).