From: h h extern <pragma@wxs.nl>
Subject: Re: No performance improvement under OS X with new beta?
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 10:17:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42297917.2030203@wxs.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050304193350.28073@mail.comp.lancs.ac.uk>
Adam Lindsay wrote:
> Matthias Weber said this at Fri, 4 Mar 2005 13:35:13 -0500:
>
>
>>>Were both runs from the same point--were they "virgin" runs?
>>>Did you precede the texexec command with a "texutil --purgeall"
>>>command,
>>>for example?
>>>--
>>>
>>
>>
>>My TeX source file is a single file with images. Most of the TeX-work
>>is done for positioning
>>floats I think (figures, tables) and for creating backgrounds.
>>
>>So I just renamed the TeX file for both runs into new file names, and
>>upated TeX for the second run.
>>I can redo the experiment on a clone machine which hasn't been updated
>>yet, but I don't
>>know whether "texutil --purgeall" will change anything. But if you tell
>>me that it will, I'll give it a try.
>
>
> Hmm. If you renamed the file for each run, then ignore that advice. I
> don't think that would be it, then.
can you make a small file that runs slower with the new versions?
sometimes these things are not related to context, but to your tex tree: the
bigger the slower, as well as settings in texmf.cnf
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-05 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-04 13:44 ConTeXt-updater i-Package updated Steffen Wolfrum
2005-03-04 13:49 ` Mark Smith
2005-03-04 15:58 ` OSX ConTeXt users inventory (was: ConTeXt-updater i-Package updated) Maurice Diamantini
2005-03-04 16:03 ` ConTeXt-updater i-Package updated David Wooten
2005-03-04 16:29 ` Thomas A.Schmitz
2005-03-04 19:50 ` Alan Bowen
2005-03-04 21:43 ` Steve Peter
2005-03-05 9:31 ` h h extern
2005-03-04 16:48 ` Adam Lindsay
2005-03-04 17:13 ` No performance improvement under OS X with new beta? Matthias Weber
2005-03-04 17:20 ` Adam Lindsay
2005-03-04 18:35 ` Matthias Weber
2005-03-04 19:33 ` Adam Lindsay
2005-03-05 9:17 ` h h extern [this message]
2005-03-04 17:24 ` Hans Hagen
2005-03-04 18:43 ` Matthias Weber
2005-03-05 9:20 ` h h extern
2005-03-09 8:09 ` Patrick Gundlach
2005-03-04 14:07 ` ConTeXt-updater i-Package updated Gerben Wierda
2005-03-04 20:13 No performance improvement under OS X with new beta? Steffen Wolfrum
2005-03-05 9:15 ` h h extern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42297917.2030203@wxs.nl \
--to=pragma@wxs.nl \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).