Re: proposed convention for variation switching [wasRE:inheriting ...

[Vit Zyka <vit.zyka@seznam.cz>]

Idris Samawi Hamid wrote:
 >
> Let's keep \sc. After all, ConTeXt already contains many redundancies (and 
> that's a good thing imho->)

Yes.

> (I think that \Var[up] (for upright figures) is more intuituve that \Var[ns]), 
> at least in English:-)))

I agree, both Adams's \Var[lf] and Idris's \Var[up] is better then my 
ns. I prefer 'lf', since a) it is related to figures, b) 'up' can be mix 
up with upshape/slanted.

> % lowercase
> light \lf 
> medium \tf
> semibold \sb
> bold \bf
> lightitalic \lt
> italic \it
> semibold italic \st
> bold italic \bi

What about:
light \lf
medium \mf
semibold \sf
bold \bf
lightitalic \li
italic \it
semibold italic \si
bold italic \bi
It is more intuitive, is't it?

I checked if they have not been occupied yet and at least in en 
interface it is OK.

vit