From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/20044 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Vit Zyka Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: proposed convention for variation switching [wasRE:inheriting ... Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 10:45:54 +0200 Message-ID: <4268B9C2.1010505@seznam.cz> References: <4278A2EE@webmail.colostate.edu> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1114159365 32418 80.91.229.2 (22 Apr 2005 08:42:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 08:42:45 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Fri Apr 22 10:42:43 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DOtje-00075K-5E for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 10:42:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A4F4127E9; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 10:46:38 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 09637-01; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 10:46:38 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7209B1276C; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 10:44:53 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B927E1276C for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 10:44:52 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 09487-03-9 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 10:44:52 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from smtp.seznam.cz (smtp.seznam.cz [212.80.76.43]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id D199C126F8 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 10:44:51 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: (qmail 20613 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2005 08:44:48 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (vit.zyka@62.240.166.134) by smtp.seznam.cz with SMTP; 22 Apr 2005 08:44:48 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users In-Reply-To: <4278A2EE@webmail.colostate.edu> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0516-6, 20.04.2005), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:20044 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:20044 Idris Samawi Hamid wrote: > > Let's keep \sc. After all, ConTeXt already contains many redundancies (and > that's a good thing imho->) Yes. > (I think that \Var[up] (for upright figures) is more intuituve that \Var[ns]), > at least in English:-))) I agree, both Adams's \Var[lf] and Idris's \Var[up] is better then my ns. I prefer 'lf', since a) it is related to figures, b) 'up' can be mix up with upshape/slanted. > % lowercase > light \lf > medium \tf > semibold \sb > bold \bf > lightitalic \lt > italic \it > semibold italic \st > bold italic \bi What about: light \lf medium \mf semibold \sf bold \bf lightitalic \li italic \it semibold italic \si bold italic \bi It is more intuitive, is't it? I checked if they have not been occupied yet and at least in en interface it is OK. vit