* BibTeX problem (all refs are [??])
@ 2005-05-04 18:43 Tobias Burnus
2005-05-06 6:58 ` Taco Hoekwater
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tobias Burnus @ 2005-05-04 18:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hello,
I've the feeling that I miss something obvious, but currently t-bib does
not work at all; I mean tex runs and bibtex happily creates the .bbl
file, but I get "cite argument myReference unknown".
I have:
texexec : TeXExec 5.2.3 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1997-2004
texutil : TeXUtil 9.0.0 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1992-2004
tex : pdfeTeX, 3.14159-1.10b-2.1 (Web2C 7.4.5)
context : ver: 2005.01.06
cont-en : ver: 2005.01.06 fmt: 2005.1.8 mes: english
And t-bib.tex claims "version=2005.01.04".
In the TeX file:
\usemodule[bib]
\setupbibtex[database=JHund]
\setuppublications[alternative=aps]
\setuppublications[numbering=yes,refcommand=num]
... \cite[phd:Haverkort:2005] ...
\placepublications
In the log file:
publications : loading database from JHund.bbl (./JHund.bbl)
systems : begin file JHund at line 8
publications : warning: cite argument phd:Haverkort:2005 unknown on 61
But: grep phd:Haverkort JHund.bbl
\startpublication[k=phd:Haverkort:2005,t=phdthesis,
Any ideas?
Tobias
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: BibTeX problem (all refs are [??])
2005-05-04 18:43 BibTeX problem (all refs are [??]) Tobias Burnus
@ 2005-05-06 6:58 ` Taco Hoekwater
2005-05-06 9:45 ` Tobias Burnus
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Taco Hoekwater @ 2005-05-06 6:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Any ideas?
Should work, of course. Can you send me JHund.bib
and/or a minimal (not-)working example?
Greetings, Taco
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: BibTeX problem (all refs are [??])
2005-05-06 6:58 ` Taco Hoekwater
@ 2005-05-06 9:45 ` Tobias Burnus
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tobias Burnus @ 2005-05-06 9:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hello,
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> Should work, of course. Can you send me JHund.bib
> and/or a minimal (not-)working example?
No, I changed the file (removed manual "[1]" and "\cite[...]" in favour
of footnotes since I wanted to add several notes to the references). I
now retried with simply adding a \cite[...] and it simply works (I
didn't even run bibtex inbetween nor did I reboot).
Well, at least it works :-)
Does anyone know how to create a footnotenumber which looks like 1
instead of \high{1}? For my poor man's references, I'd like to say "in
Ref.~\footnote[id]{Author, title (year). This is based on ... and covers
esp...}", but this looks strange when printed as "in Ref. \high{1}".
Tobias
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-05-06 9:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-05-04 18:43 BibTeX problem (all refs are [??]) Tobias Burnus
2005-05-06 6:58 ` Taco Hoekwater
2005-05-06 9:45 ` Tobias Burnus
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).