BibTeX problem (all refs are [??])

BibTeX problem (all refs are [??])

[Tobias Burnus]

Hello,

I've the feeling that I miss something obvious, but currently t-bib does 
not work at all; I mean tex runs and bibtex happily creates the .bbl 
file, but I get "cite argument myReference unknown".

I have:
               texexec : TeXExec 5.2.3 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1997-2004
               texutil : TeXUtil 9.0.0 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1992-2004
                   tex : pdfeTeX, 3.14159-1.10b-2.1 (Web2C 7.4.5)
               context : ver: 2005.01.06
               cont-en : ver: 2005.01.06  fmt: 2005.1.8  mes: english
And t-bib.tex claims "version=2005.01.04".

In the TeX file:
\usemodule[bib]
\setupbibtex[database=JHund]
\setuppublications[alternative=aps]
\setuppublications[numbering=yes,refcommand=num]
... \cite[phd:Haverkort:2005] ...
\placepublications

In the log file:
publications   : loading database from JHund.bbl (./JHund.bbl)
systems        : begin file JHund at line 8
publications   : warning: cite argument phd:Haverkort:2005 unknown on 61

But: grep phd:Haverkort JHund.bbl
\startpublication[k=phd:Haverkort:2005,t=phdthesis,

Any ideas?

Tobias

Re: BibTeX problem (all refs are [??])

[Taco Hoekwater]

Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Any ideas?

Should work, of course. Can you send me JHund.bib
and/or  a minimal (not-)working example?

Greetings, Taco

Re: BibTeX problem (all refs are [??])

[Tobias Burnus]

Hello,

Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> Should work, of course. Can you send me JHund.bib
> and/or  a minimal (not-)working example?
No, I changed the file (removed manual "[1]" and "\cite[...]" in favour
of footnotes since I wanted to add several notes to the references). I
now retried with simply adding a \cite[...] and it simply works (I
didn't even run bibtex inbetween nor did I reboot).
Well, at least it works :-)

Does anyone know how to create a footnotenumber which looks like 1
instead of \high{1}? For my poor man's references, I'd like to say "in
Ref.~\footnote[id]{Author, title (year). This is based on ... and covers
esp...}", but this looks strange when printed as "in Ref. \high{1}".

Tobias