From: Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de>
Subject: Re: Context, LaTeX, or an XML for academic writing?
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 02:59:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <428941D4.8010105@net-b.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e06bd0fe050514054538ef7021@mail.gmail.com>
Hello,
Tobias Wolf wrote:
>today I went to work to make up my mind about whether it would be a
>good idea to go ahead and produce my BSc. Thesis with ConTeXt.
>It's clear, I'm very much attracted to it's approach, I do like the
>syntax and the focus on PDF output (I never used DVI before) et cetera
>pp.
>
>
As John already pointed out: Using "pdflatex" this is also possible with
LaTeX (well, both use PDFTeX behind the scenes).
>I've seen Hrabans' ciee juxtaposition of ConTeXt and LaTeX, and after
>searching the list I am not sure whether going for a KOMA class
>wouldn't be better considering that I definitely don't have time
>develop my own ConTeXt environment this time.
>
>
Well, the question is how much you want to change; I think one can (in
both cases) live with the defaults provided (plus some minor changes).
The defaults in LaTeX are arguably better, ConTeXt on the other hand
allows changes much easier. I have also the feeling that ConTeXt's
figure placement is better - at least I had so far not as much problems
as with LaTeX. (In LaTeX frequently all figures are collected at the
very end of the document -- or in between when one does a \clearpage.)
>I've also seen the MS thesis of Han The Thanh. It's good. But I would
>need something more suited for natural sciences that accomodates
>plenty of figures and references. Also I would like to "cloak" my
>thesis by avoiding Computer Modern.
>Do ready-made "academic templates" by one of you experts exist - or
>do you dissuade me from "just using" ConTeXt for for writing academic
>literature?
>
>
One reason to favour LaTeX is that many publishing houses are accepting
LaTeX submission, while for ConTeXt less so. This is maybe less a
problem for BSc/MSc theses, but for PhD theses, where one frequently
includes some (own, published) papers, this means extra work. Having
said that, I have written my diploma (~ MSc) thesis in physics using
ConTeXt and I do plan to do so for my PhD as well.
I can send you the environment I used;¹ the layout could probably done
better, but I think (hope) that it looks quite ok; I used Latin
Modern/Computer Modern at 12pt on A4. (For my PhD theses I'll use
probably use octavo/A5.) Changing the used font is easy, but one has to
find one which contains all characters needed (incl. maths symbols,
small caps [if needed], AMS Math symbols [or the font should fit to
those AMS fonts], etc.)
Tobias
¹ http://www.physik.fu-berlin.de/~tburnus/thesis/thesis.pdf, 5.6 MiB
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-17 0:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-14 12:45 Tobias Wolf
2005-05-16 17:50 ` John R. Culleton
2005-05-17 0:59 ` Tobias Burnus [this message]
2005-05-17 12:41 ` Tobias Wolf
2005-05-17 4:03 ` Matthias Weber
[not found] ` <e06bd0fe050517055047c3210b@mail.gmail.com>
2005-05-17 12:52 ` Tobias Wolf
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-17 22:41 Ville Voipio
2005-05-18 2:10 ` Paul Tremblay
2005-05-07 2:58 CB
2005-05-09 9:48 ` Ville Voipio
2005-05-10 23:52 ` CB
2005-05-11 6:52 ` Henning Hraban Ramm
2005-05-12 13:46 ` Ville Voipio
2005-05-13 0:05 ` CB
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=428941D4.8010105@net-b.de \
--to=burnus@net-b.de \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).