From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/20720 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Taco Hoekwater Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Re: newest version on teTeX-3.0 Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 23:31:24 +0200 Message-ID: <42A6122C.8040603@elvenkind.com> References: <42A1806C.1030701@wxs.nl> <42A3375D.6030003@elvenkind.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1118180005 21989 80.91.229.2 (7 Jun 2005 21:33:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 21:33:25 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Tue Jun 07 23:33:21 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DflfU-0005nD-Vy for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 23:31:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8708D127B0; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 23:35:24 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 10723-04-3; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 23:35:20 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE3E5127C0; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 23:35:20 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1769A127C0 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 23:35:20 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 10723-04-2 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 23:35:19 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from post-24.mail.nl.demon.net (post-24.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.194]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A996127B0 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 23:35:18 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from boo.demon.nl ([82.161.175.147]:49523 helo=[192.168.1.3]) by post-24.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dflj8-0005IZ-Gq for ntg-context@ntg.nl; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 21:35:16 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050215) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on smtp.ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:20720 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:20720 Patrick Gundlach wrote: > Hi all, > > > >>Barring typo's, this wiki page should be a help for people trying >>to upgrade a 'normal' teTeX: >> >> http://contextgarden.net/TeTeX_3.0_installation > > > Very nice page, Taco. One remark though: TEXFORMATS doesn't have to be > set. - Or do you have "better" experience with it? It is set in the default texmnf.cnf from teTeX, so I just amended as needed. It is definately needed when there are still formats in 'bare' web2c because that would overshadow web2c/pdfetex if there was no TEXFORMATS setting. But if there are no such formats, then I suspect it makes no difference whether TEXFORMATS is set or not. Not tested though. Taco