From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/21950 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Vit Zyka Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Re: ec encoding and tcaron Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 10:51:28 +0200 Message-ID: <4301A910.6090409@seznam.cz> References: <42FE238A.2080106@seznam.cz> <430104B0.4010404@seznam.cz> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1124182565 4424 80.91.229.2 (16 Aug 2005 08:56:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 08:56:05 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Tue Aug 16 10:55:54 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E4xDt-0000kY-B5 for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 10:55:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB87C127CC; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 10:55:04 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 05816-05; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 10:55:04 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75714127DE; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 10:51:25 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 104E1127DE for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 10:51:24 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 05818-06 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 10:51:23 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from smtp.seznam.cz (smtp.seznam.cz [212.80.76.43]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 099DD127CC for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 10:51:22 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: (qmail 2706 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2005 08:51:22 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (vit.zyka@62.240.166.134) by bender.go.seznam.cz with SMTP; 16 Aug 2005 08:51:22 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0531-4, 05.08.2005), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on smtp.ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:21950 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:21950 Patrick Gundlach wrote: > Hi Vit, > > >>It is some kind of inconsistency/bug in the ec encoding: if there is >>equivalent /dcaron present, then trere should be /tcaron too instead >>/trightquote. > > > So, how do the fonts name the glyph? looking to my font/afm directory: afm>grep -S -l "tcaron" *.afm | perl -n -e "$i=0;while(<>){$i++;}print\"$i\n\"" 761 afm>grep -S -l "tquoteright" *.afm | perl -n -e "$i=0;while(<>){$i++;}print\"$i\n\"" 69 but from these 69, 53 are from lm, and in lm these glyph is dubdled (both tcaron and tquoteright): lmr10.afm: C -1 ; WX 388.88889 ; N tquoteright ; B 19 -11 332 699 ; lmr10.afm: C -1 ; WX 388.88889 ; N tcaron ; B 19 -11 332 699 ; the rest 16 files are: 8x .\ibm\courier\*.afm and 8x .\ibm\times\*.afm even there are both glyphs but with different metrics grep -S "tcaron" cour.afm C -1 ; WX 600 ; N tcaron ; B 94 -14 538 720 ; CC tcaron 2 ; PCC t 0 0 ; PCC caron -77 92 ; grep -S "tquoteright" cour.afm C -1 ; WX 600 ; N tquoteright ; B 73 -14 646 563 ; So it seems that fonts are using /tcaron; lm use /tquoteright only for sure. Does anybody know who is responsibility/background for ec encoding? vit