modules.pdf

["luigi.scarso" <luigi.scarso@logosrl.it>]

Mojca Miklavec wrote:

>
>I would suggest to keep the old files and name them like
>2005-08-16-modules.pdf 
>
done

>(and perhaps to keep all the files (except
>ConTeXt itself of course) since they have to be updated from time to
>time as new files are added to the distribution). That way the old
>content will not misteriously disappear.
>
>  
>
patches.zip contains patches for files with  some typo-errors (eg. $x4 
instead of $x$)
they  are (almost) irrelevant at format-generation time, because they 
are not
processed at all .

Also, some macros are in dutch (eg, \blank[2*groot]);
I excluded some others macros (\startpostponing ), correct some others
( \getvalue{period graybox} with \dotgray)
added \loadmap[gbk].... and so on.

Partial contents  are ugly (or broken ?) ;
there are many important modules to document (see Core Commands in 
modules.pdf;
inside modules.tex, 3=>ok, 1=>to be documented, 0=> to be exctract)

There are some overfull lines;
maybe there is a better sectioning (or multiple pdfs ?).


So, I think that this is a good starting point

I think that all patches should be approvated before to go into an 
official distro;
after that we can discuss all other stuffs.


>It would be a nice idea to put that files on the garden anyway
>  
>

no problem to me

luigi