From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/21968 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "luigi.scarso" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: modules.pdf Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 19:01:02 +0200 Message-ID: <43036D4E.6030801@logosrl.it> References: <4301B300.8060202@wxs.nl> <6faad9f005081611414a199fdb@mail.gmail.com> <43023C35.3050803@wxs.nl> <6faad9f005081705454af7cb08@mail.gmail.com> <43033F61.6030302@wxs.nl> <6faad9f005081707293edc026b@mail.gmail.com> <430352DE.7030703@logosrl.it> <6faad9f005081708197ea52db9@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1124298319 30922 80.91.229.2 (17 Aug 2005 17:05:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:05:19 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Wed Aug 17 19:05:18 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E5RLY-0004ZS-Cq for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 19:05:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 173C5127CD; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 19:05:00 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 17983-02; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 19:04:59 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A46B127A0; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 19:01:18 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8202127A0 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 19:01:16 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 17856-03 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 19:01:15 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ServerNotes.logosrl.it (81-208-99-91.ip.fastwebnet.it [81.208.99.91]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D596C12784 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 19:01:15 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from [192.168.2.85] ([192.168.2.85]) by ServerNotes.logosrl.it (Lotus Domino Release 6.5.1) with ESMTP id 2005081719012072-295 ; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 19:01:20 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users In-Reply-To: <6faad9f005081708197ea52db9@mail.gmail.com> X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on ServerNotes/Logo(Release 6.5.1|January 21, 2004) at 17/08/2005 19.01.20, Serialize by Router on ServerNotes/Logo(Release 6.5.1|January 21, 2004) at 17/08/2005 19.01.21, Serialize complete at 17/08/2005 19.01.21 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on smtp.ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:21968 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:21968 Mojca Miklavec wrote: > >I would suggest to keep the old files and name them like >2005-08-16-modules.pdf > done >(and perhaps to keep all the files (except >ConTeXt itself of course) since they have to be updated from time to >time as new files are added to the distribution). That way the old >content will not misteriously disappear. > > > patches.zip contains patches for files with some typo-errors (eg. $x4 instead of $x$) they are (almost) irrelevant at format-generation time, because they are not processed at all . Also, some macros are in dutch (eg, \blank[2*groot]); I excluded some others macros (\startpostponing ), correct some others ( \getvalue{period graybox} with \dotgray) added \loadmap[gbk].... and so on. Partial contents are ugly (or broken ?) ; there are many important modules to document (see Core Commands in modules.pdf; inside modules.tex, 3=>ok, 1=>to be documented, 0=> to be exctract) There are some overfull lines; maybe there is a better sectioning (or multiple pdfs ?). So, I think that this is a good starting point I think that all patches should be approvated before to go into an official distro; after that we can discuss all other stuffs. >It would be a nice idea to put that files on the garden anyway > > no problem to me luigi