Thanks. I did a context run and now I am asking: shouldn't the API details given for each setup?
For example:
\xmlflush{NODE}
\xmltext{NODE}{LPATH}

Not all are so evident, see for example on page 18 the explanation for \xmlprocessbuffer:
registers buffer NAME as NAME and ...
Which I think could be better (iff I do understand correctly)
\xmlprocessbuffer{NAME}{BUFFER}{XMLSETUP}

Hans van der Meer

> On 12 Oct 2016, at 16:54, Wolfgang Schuster <schuster.wolfgang@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Meer, Hans van der 12. Oktober 2016 um 16:49
>> Did a small disaster happen in typesetting the XML manual? I find "MISSING SETUP"s all over the place. See the sample page.
>> This is ConTeXt  ver: 2016.10.08 00:11 MKIV beta
> xml-mkiv.tex (line 24):
>
> -\loadsetups[i-en-xml.xml]
> +\loadsetups[i-xml.xml]
>
> Wolfgang
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
>
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
> archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
> wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
> ___________________________________________________________________________________