From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/22434 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: puzzling metafun graphics Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:59:36 +0200 Message-ID: <4325A5E8.9080505@wxs.nl> References: Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1126547765 17866 80.91.229.2 (12 Sep 2005 17:56:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:56:05 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Mon Sep 12 19:55:54 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EEsVR-0004MH-0T for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:54:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B96F01279E; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:54:12 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 13387-02-2; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:54:09 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3697F12802; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:30:54 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB0E8127BE for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:30:52 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 12248-02-3 for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:30:51 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mailrelay02.solcon.nl (maillb.solcon.nl [212.45.32.200]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6808612826 for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:59:34 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from server-1.pragma-net.nl (dsl-212-84-128-085.solcon.nl [212.84.128.85]) by mailrelay02.solcon.nl (8.12.11/SQL-8.12.11-5/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j8CFxU2d027102 for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:59:30 +0200 Original-Received: by server-1.pragma-net.nl (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 83168361C8; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:06:22 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from [10.100.1.15] (unknown [10.100.1.15]) by server-1.pragma-net.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34BB02DC48 for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 15:06:21 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.86.2, clamav-milter version 0.86 on mailrelay02 X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on smtp.ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:22434 Archived-At: Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: > This one hast just cost me two hours, and I'm still baffled. The > story (in shorthand): was trying to integrate a positional metafun > graphic into a presentation. I got no output. I tried making a > minimal example file to reproduce the problem, and sure enough, > everything went fine. I rebuilt the entire file, by pasting one > paragraph of the original file at a time, and I got exactly the > output I wanted. [Drumroll] I deleted the original file and > everything associated with it [i.e. all those .tui and .tuo etc.], > saved the new file from my /tmp directory to my working directory, > and -- I got no output again. diff shows that both files are > identical. Looking at the logs, there's only one difference I can spot: > > < \openout5 = `test-mpgraph.mp'. > --- > > \openout5 = `05.11.08-mpgraph.mp'. > 205,206c206,207 > < [MP to PDF] (./test-mpgraph.1) [MP to PDF] (./test-mpgraph.2) > < [MP to PDF] (./test-mpgraph.3) > --- > > [MP 05.11.08-mpgraph.1] [MP 05.11.08-mpgraph.2] > > [MP 05.11.08-mpgraph.3] > 211c212 > < systems : end file test at line 426 > --- > > systems : end file 05.11.08 at line 426 > 213c214 > < [flush and process test-mpgraph.mp afterwards] ) > --- > > [flush and process 05.11.08-mpgraph.mp afterwards] ) > > The "MP to PDF" part is missing from the file 05.11.08, which might > explain why I don't see anything in the resulting pdf. But why? Can > anybody enlighten me why the same file can behave differently? And > how I can coax ConTeXt into running this MP to PDF thingy? Thanks So the only difference in the source files is the filename? (should not make much of a difference because mp conversion is rather stupid) Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------