From: Christopher Creutzig <christopher@creutzig.de>
Subject: Re: lilypond inclusion
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 17:40:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <432AE779.5000003@creutzig.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ba521839f64b279e30dd76c15651affa@di.unito.it>
andrea valle wrote:
> So, I was asking myself: is lily direct inclusion in context so
> relevant? Why?
No, in the same way there is really no absolute need to have MetaPost
code directly in you TeX files. Having them in external files,
compiling from a Makefile and just using \externalfigure[gfx-1.pdf]
works perfectly. It's just that some people (often including me) prefer
to have their sources in one place, especially when using small snippets.
Oh, and of course including the sources in the TeX files allows things
such as passing parameters (not yet done for lilypond), such as the
proper-page-break thing I mentioned.
Christopher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-16 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-15 9:49 Christopher Creutzig
2005-09-15 10:35 ` Hans Hagen
2005-09-15 13:07 ` Christopher Creutzig
2005-09-15 13:53 ` Hans Hagen
2005-09-15 14:34 ` Henning Hraban Ramm
2005-09-15 21:00 ` andrea valle
2005-09-16 0:37 ` Henning Hraban Ramm
2005-09-16 14:13 ` lilypond inclusion + pdf crop andrea valle
2005-09-16 15:25 ` [OT] " luigi.scarso
2005-09-16 15:29 ` Hans Hagen
2005-09-16 17:18 ` Willi Egger
2005-09-16 21:08 ` andrea valle
2005-09-18 19:38 ` Hans Hagen
2005-09-19 9:51 ` Taco Hoekwater
2005-09-17 11:26 ` Christopher Creutzig
2005-09-17 13:23 ` andrea valle
2005-09-16 16:23 ` lilypond inclusion + pdf crop (getting off-topic) Adam Lindsay
2005-09-16 17:37 ` Hans Hagen
2005-09-17 9:28 ` Re[2]: " Giuseppe Bilotta
2005-09-18 18:23 ` Hans Hagen
2005-09-18 19:19 ` Re[2]: " Giuseppe Bilotta
2005-09-16 15:40 ` Christopher Creutzig [this message]
2005-09-16 16:10 ` lilypond inclusion andrea valle
2005-09-16 15:42 ` Christopher Creutzig
2005-09-16 16:39 ` Patrick Gundlach
2005-09-16 16:56 ` Mojca Miklavec
2005-09-16 17:45 ` Hans Hagen
2005-09-16 18:51 ` Christopher Creutzig
2005-09-16 19:20 ` Mojca Miklavec
2005-09-16 19:45 ` Hans Hagen
2005-09-16 20:25 ` Mojca Miklavec
2005-09-18 18:07 ` Hans Hagen
2005-09-16 20:46 ` Christopher Creutzig
2005-09-18 18:09 ` Hans Hagen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=432AE779.5000003@creutzig.de \
--to=christopher@creutzig.de \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).