From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/6883 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Giuseppe Bilotta Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re[2]: Incomplete style switch Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 13:47:44 +0100 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <433838713.20020211134744@bigfoot.com> References: <5.1.0.14.1.20020210201541.03525ae8@server-1> Reply-To: Giuseppe Bilotta NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035397387 14667 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 18:23:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:23:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-To: Hans Hagen In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.1.20020210201541.03525ae8@server-1> Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:6883 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:6883 Sunday, February 10, 2002 Hans Hagen wrote: HH> At 09:51 PM 2/7/2002 +0100, you wrote: >>My question is: is this a bug? Shouldn't the style specified in >>the label definition take precedence? (i.e. shouldn't it be >>applied *after* the location style?) HH> it's a left over from an old mechanism which needs to be repaired, which i HH> will do (new beta soon anyway) Are you going to let \bf and \bold change to \bi when issued within an \it? -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta