* bug in \seeindex
@ 2005-09-27 21:58 Thomas A. Schmitz
2005-09-28 7:01 ` Thomas A. Schmitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas A. Schmitz @ 2005-09-27 21:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
The code in \seeindex has a bug. There was something in the mailing
list about a year ago (2004-06-21), but as far as I can see, the
patch Hans proposed then has been integrated into core-reg.tex.
Here's a minimal test file:
\starttext
This \index{this} and \index{and} that \seeindex{this}.
\placeindex
\stoptext
And the error log:
! Argument of \@@filterlevelpart has an extra }.
<inserted text>
\par
<to be read again>
}
\doifprevlevelelse ...tor \@@filterlevelpart [#1]}
\edef
\@@tocsectiontype {\...
\dosetpageregisterpage ...->\doifreglevelelse [#5]
{\dodosetpageregisterpage ...
l.46 ...isterpage{index}{,}{3}{2::0:0:0:0:0:0:0}{}
Unfortunately, the bug messes up the .tui file, so even if you delete
the \seeindex command, the file will not compile unless you delete
the .tui manually. Ideas, anybody?
Best
Thomas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: bug in \seeindex
2005-09-27 21:58 bug in \seeindex Thomas A. Schmitz
@ 2005-09-28 7:01 ` Thomas A. Schmitz
2005-09-28 7:40 ` luigi.scarso
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas A. Schmitz @ 2005-09-28 7:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
And I don't have a solution, but another bug in registers: if you
modify my example like so:
\starttext
This \index{This} and \index{And} that \index{That}.
\placeindex
\stoptext
you'll see one interesting detail in the pdf: This and That are in
the index under "h," And under "n" ==> capital letters are not taken
into account in index generation, which is a trifle inconvenient.
Best
Thomas
On Sep 27, 2005, at 11:58 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
> The code in \seeindex has a bug. There was something in the mailing
> list about a year ago (2004-06-21), but as far as I can see, the
> patch Hans proposed then has been integrated into core-reg.tex.
> Here's a minimal test file:
>
> \starttext
>
> This \index{this} and \index{and} that \seeindex{this}.
>
> \placeindex
>
> \stoptext
>
> And the error log:
>
> ! Argument of \@@filterlevelpart has an extra }.
> <inserted text>
> \par
> <to be read again>
> }
> \doifprevlevelelse ...tor \@@filterlevelpart [#1]}
> \edef
> \@@tocsectiontype {\...
>
> \dosetpageregisterpage ...->\doifreglevelelse [#5]
>
> {\dodosetpageregisterpage ...
> l.46 ...isterpage{index}{,}{3}{2::0:0:0:0:0:0:0}{}
>
> Unfortunately, the bug messes up the .tui file, so even if you
> delete the \seeindex command, the file will not compile unless you
> delete the .tui manually. Ideas, anybody?
>
> Best
>
> Thomas
> _______________________________________________
> ntg-context mailing list
> ntg-context@ntg.nl
> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: bug in \seeindex
2005-09-28 7:01 ` Thomas A. Schmitz
@ 2005-09-28 7:40 ` luigi.scarso
2005-09-28 7:51 ` Thomas A. Schmitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: luigi.scarso @ 2005-09-28 7:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
> And I don't have a solution, but another bug in registers: if you
> modify my example like so:
>
> \starttext
>
> This \index{This} and \index{And} that \index{That}.
>
> \placeindex
>
> \stoptext
>
> you'll see one interesting detail in the pdf: This and That are in
> the index under "h," And under "n" ==> capital letters are not taken
> into account in index generation, which is a trifle inconvenient.
hmm, not for me.
This and That are under 't', And under 'a'
# texexec --version
TeXExec 5.4.3 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1997-2005
texexec : TeXExec 5.4.3 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1997-2005
texutil : TeXUtil 9.0.0 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1992-2004
tex : pdfeTeXk, 3.141592-1.30.3-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.5)
context : ver: 2005.08.31
cont-en : ver: 2005.08.31 fmt: 2005.9.8 mes: english
cont-nl : ver: 2005.08.31 fmt: 2005.9.8 mes: english
luigi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: bug in \seeindex
2005-09-28 7:40 ` luigi.scarso
@ 2005-09-28 7:51 ` Thomas A. Schmitz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas A. Schmitz @ 2005-09-28 7:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
OK, I have to modify my last mail: the bizarre sorting bug only
occurs when I use newtexexec. The bug with /seeindex occurs both in
newtexexec and "old" texexec. Thanks luigi, for looking at this!
Thomas
On Sep 28, 2005, at 9:40 AM, luigi.scarso wrote:
> hmm, not for me.
> This and That are under 't', And under 'a'
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-09-28 7:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-09-27 21:58 bug in \seeindex Thomas A. Schmitz
2005-09-28 7:01 ` Thomas A. Schmitz
2005-09-28 7:40 ` luigi.scarso
2005-09-28 7:51 ` Thomas A. Schmitz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).