From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/23920 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Taco Hoekwater Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: \nomarking feature request Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 13:30:03 +0100 Message-ID: <438C49CB.5030603@elvenkind.com> References: <438C1FF0.8060505@elvenkind.com> <438C31F7.3070305@wxs.nl> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1133271959 19743 80.91.229.2 (29 Nov 2005 13:45:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 13:45:59 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Tue Nov 29 14:45:49 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eh4df-0004xn-W1 for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 13:31:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B36501282A; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 13:31:13 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 22889-03; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 13:31:08 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C5341280F; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 13:31:08 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 989821280F for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 13:31:07 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 22888-04-2 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 13:31:06 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from post-25.mail.nl.demon.net (post-25.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.195]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FB831278B for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 13:31:06 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from boo.demon.nl ([82.161.175.147]:52017 helo=[192.168.1.3]) by post-25.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Eh4dW-0004MR-5Y for ntg-context@ntg.nl; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 12:31:06 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050215) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users In-Reply-To: <438C31F7.3070305@wxs.nl> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:23920 Archived-At: Hans Hagen wrote: > Taco Hoekwater wrote: > >> Hi Hans, >> >> Currently \nomarking expand into (essentially) \unknown. >> Is it possible to make that configurable? I now have >> >> \section{title\nomarking{\footnote{note}}} >> \marking[section]{title} >> >> and that is rather ugly (or is there a better way?) > > > it is, kind of; copied from source: > > %\def\nomarking##1{\unknown\ }% > \def\nomarking{\splitsequence{\getvalue{\??mk#1\c!limittext}}}% Yes I saw that, but changing the language parameter has side-effects :-) My vote goes to removing the note markers altogether, btw. Footnote symbols just do not belong inside \mark-ed stuff. Cheers, Taco