* \nomarking feature request
@ 2005-11-29 9:31 Taco Hoekwater
2005-11-29 10:48 ` Hans Hagen
2005-11-29 13:18 ` Hans Hagen
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Taco Hoekwater @ 2005-11-29 9:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hi Hans,
Currently \nomarking expand into (essentially) \unknown.
Is it possible to make that configurable? I now have
\section{title\nomarking{\footnote{note}}}
\marking[section]{title}
and that is rather ugly (or is there a better way?)
Taco
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: \nomarking feature request
2005-11-29 9:31 \nomarking feature request Taco Hoekwater
@ 2005-11-29 10:48 ` Hans Hagen
2005-11-29 12:30 ` Taco Hoekwater
2005-11-29 13:18 ` Hans Hagen
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Hans Hagen @ 2005-11-29 10:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> Currently \nomarking expand into (essentially) \unknown.
> Is it possible to make that configurable? I now have
>
> \section{title\nomarking{\footnote{note}}}
> \marking[section]{title}
>
> and that is rather ugly (or is there a better way?)
it is, kind of; copied from source:
%\def\nomarking##1{\unknown\ }%
\def\nomarking{\splitsequence{\getvalue{\??mk#1\c!limittext}}}%
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: \nomarking feature request
2005-11-29 10:48 ` Hans Hagen
@ 2005-11-29 12:30 ` Taco Hoekwater
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Taco Hoekwater @ 2005-11-29 12:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hans Hagen wrote:
> Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>
>> Hi Hans,
>>
>> Currently \nomarking expand into (essentially) \unknown.
>> Is it possible to make that configurable? I now have
>>
>> \section{title\nomarking{\footnote{note}}}
>> \marking[section]{title}
>>
>> and that is rather ugly (or is there a better way?)
>
>
> it is, kind of; copied from source:
>
> %\def\nomarking##1{\unknown\ }%
> \def\nomarking{\splitsequence{\getvalue{\??mk#1\c!limittext}}}%
Yes I saw that, but changing the language parameter has
side-effects :-)
My vote goes to removing the note markers altogether, btw.
Footnote symbols just do not belong inside \mark-ed stuff.
Cheers, Taco
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: \nomarking feature request
2005-11-29 9:31 \nomarking feature request Taco Hoekwater
2005-11-29 10:48 ` Hans Hagen
@ 2005-11-29 13:18 ` Hans Hagen
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Hans Hagen @ 2005-11-29 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> Currently \nomarking expand into (essentially) \unknown.
> Is it possible to make that configurable? I now have
>
> \section{title\nomarking{\footnote{note}}}
> \marking[section]{title}
>
> and that is rather ugly (or is there a better way?)
how about introducing an \everymarking and then
\appendtoks \notesenabledfalse \to \everymarking?
Hans
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-11-29 13:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-11-29 9:31 \nomarking feature request Taco Hoekwater
2005-11-29 10:48 ` Hans Hagen
2005-11-29 12:30 ` Taco Hoekwater
2005-11-29 13:18 ` Hans Hagen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).