From: Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl>
Subject: Re: An idea
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 15:14:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <439056C6.6080804@wxs.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051201162914.GA14497@fly.srk.fer.hr>
Zeljko Vrba wrote:
>A motivation and idea that came to mind while writing a post to comp.text.tex:
>
>==
>Then again, most (all?) of publishers require Latex source, if my document
>ever makes it that far.. And Latex has nicer source code formatting than
>Context. so I'm really split between Latex and Context..
>
>
>
what do you mean with source code formatting?
>None of them individually fit all (I admit, vague) requirements.. Context
>being able to chew up Latex .cls files and still allowing for its advanced
>formatting directives, long tables, and other goodies would be a perfect
>match.
>==
>
>Basically, rewrite standard Latex environments and commands (\chapter,
>\section, itemize, enumerate, etc..) present in article.cls and report.cls
>to expand to Context commands that give an equivalent layout..
>
>How much work would it be? Either a Latex emulation environment or a new
>implementation of "Latex classes" for Context?
>
>I have to admit that I don't have time to start implementing either. I'm just
>interested in some feasibility opinions..
>
>80% of Latex<>Context transition can be done with a few simple regexes.
>Other 20% have to be translated by hand, and it is very painful, esp.
>if tables are in question..
>
>
brooks is working on that so maybe you should team up with him
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-02 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-01 16:29 Zeljko Vrba
2005-12-02 14:14 ` Hans Hagen [this message]
2005-12-02 17:43 ` Zeljko Vrba
2005-12-02 16:56 ` Nikolai Weibull
2005-12-02 17:04 ` Taco Hoekwater
2005-12-02 19:15 ` Re[2]: " Giuseppe Bilotta
2005-12-02 17:46 ` Zeljko Vrba
2005-12-02 18:43 ` Nikolai Weibull
2005-12-03 19:45 ` Nikolai Weibull
2005-12-03 22:48 ` Christopher Creutzig
2005-12-04 17:57 ` Nikolai Weibull
2005-12-04 19:00 ` Hans Hagen
2005-12-11 21:17 ` Christopher Creutzig
2005-12-04 18:59 ` Hans Hagen
2005-12-04 19:14 ` Nikolai Weibull
2005-12-04 20:38 ` Hans Hagen
2005-12-05 20:48 ` Nikolai Weibull
2005-12-06 9:11 ` Hans Hagen
2005-12-05 19:27 ` Mojca Miklavec
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=439056C6.6080804@wxs.nl \
--to=pragma@wxs.nl \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).