From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/24184 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: columnset & layers Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 17:10:12 +0100 Message-ID: <4395B7E4.7010507@wxs.nl> References: <4394DE01.9000608@seznam.cz> <439559E5.6040108@wxs.nl> <43959AE6.30002@seznam.cz> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1133885564 19600 80.91.229.2 (6 Dec 2005 16:12:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 16:12:44 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Tue Dec 06 17:12:33 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EjfOa-0005o5-3H for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 17:10:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50CB312875; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 17:10:22 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 02531-05; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 17:10:18 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8925E12849; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 17:10:18 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F0A612849 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 17:10:17 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 02553-03 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 17:10:16 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from controller-1 (dsl-212-84-128-085.solcon.nl [212.84.128.85]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F96C12835 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 17:10:15 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from [10.100.1.102] (unverified [10.100.1.102]) by controller-1 (SurgeMail 3.5b3) with ESMTP id 6637 for ; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 17:16:00 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users In-Reply-To: <43959AE6.30002@seznam.cz> X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com r=-274017400 X-Authenticated-User: hagen@controller-1 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:24184 Archived-At: Vit Zyka wrote: > But generally it is not a clean solution. Can be solved counting > number of layers in one pass and defining in the second, but... Hans, > do you think is the grouping problem doable? If yes I will put the > note to the collector. it's kind of tricky to make definitions global (since it hooks into framed and such) so, the best is to do more testing and/or do assignment in layer definitions global you can make it a low priority entru in the collection Hans