From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/24275 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: bold \tt and pdf-output Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 11:52:50 +0100 Message-ID: <439D5682.8030803@wxs.nl> References: <4395578D.3040204@elvenkind.com> <4395E817.70201@wxs.nl> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1134384979 16055 80.91.229.2 (12 Dec 2005 10:56:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:56:19 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Mon Dec 12 11:56:14 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EllKJ-0000GV-DF for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 11:54:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 275CA127E1; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 11:54:39 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 26607-06; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 11:54:38 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C08D8127D8; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 11:52:53 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 952E5127D8 for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 11:52:52 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 26454-06-3 for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 11:52:51 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from controller-1 (dsl-212-84-128-085.solcon.nl [212.84.128.85]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E572127D3 for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 11:52:51 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from [10.100.1.102] (unverified [10.100.1.102]) by controller-1 (SurgeMail 3.5b3) with ESMTP id 7333 for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 11:59:14 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl In-Reply-To: X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com r=-274017400 X-Authenticated-User: hagen@controller-1 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:24275 Archived-At: =EF=BF=BD wrote: >On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Hans Hagen wrote: > > =20 > >>>automatically. >>>Test-file: >>>\documentclass{article} >>>\usepackage[T1]{fontenc} >>>\usepackage{lmodern} >>>\begin{document} >>>\texttt{Normal and \textbf{bold Type-Writer}} >>>\end{document} >>>=20 >>> >>> =20 >>> >>not automatically, you have to ask for it: \usepackage{lmodern} >> =20 >> > >Hi Hans, > >ok, you're right. What I meant: after loading lm, no further work is nee= ded >to get bold tt. > > =20 > sure, but it would break compatibility (unless everyone agrees upon =20 having bold tt enabled by default); latex has different compatibility=20 rules (and does not default to latin modern) >>>But they are not so bold as the cmbtt ones. Anyway: how could the dark= lmtt >>>font be activated in ConTeXt and could this be included in the >>>distribution? >>>=20 >>> >>> =20 >>> >>by default, context loads the cmr fonts with design sizes, nowadays=20 >>replaced by their latin modern alternative >> >>in order to be backward compatible (although one can dispute the=20 >>neccessity of this) the dark etc variants are not used >> =20 >> > >In fact, you are never backward compatible. Just an example: >\setupindenting[medium] is now \setupindenting[medium] >And there are a lot more. > =20 > hm, not that many i hope; concerning the indenting, that was basically a=20 merge of two commands [and the auto yes was a bug] >If someone does not want bold tt in lm, then there could be a switch lik= e >"\nobftt". > >Nevertheless: thanks for your suggestions, they work very well! > =20 > Hans