From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/24625 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Answer blocks potential Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 11:13:17 +0100 Message-ID: <43AA7C3D.5000606@wxs.nl> References: Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1135246413 14151 80.91.229.2 (22 Dec 2005 10:13:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:13:33 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Thu Dec 22 11:13:32 2005 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EpNRv-0007Pj-Ao for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 11:13:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D80EC128B3; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 11:13:26 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 13020-02-5; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 11:13:21 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6917E1289E; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 11:13:21 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2376C1289E for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 11:13:20 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 13020-02-4 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 11:13:19 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from mail.pragma-ade.net (dsl-212-84-128-085.solcon.nl [212.84.128.85]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1A4B1289D for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 11:13:17 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from [10.100.1.102] (unverified [10.100.1.102]) by controller-1 (SurgeMail 3.5b3) with ESMTP id 8862 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 11:20:44 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users In-Reply-To: X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com r=-274017400 X-Authenticated-User: hagen@controller-1 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:24625 Archived-At: David Arnold wrote: > Hans, Taco, et al, > > I've looked at the question-answer block suggestion and it has good > potential for what I want to do. What I need now is a way of > typesetting the blocks as follows. > > 1. Question 2. Question > 3. Question 4. Question > > Then, later in the document, I'll unhide the answer blocks. > > Is it worth my while to try to use question-answer blocks in an > itemized environment? should I pursue that or try a different tack? no. it can only be used at the outer level Hans