From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/25108 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Font memory issues ? Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:28:09 +0100 Message-ID: <43C61319.3000104@wxs.nl> References: <35AB8A55-351B-4B53-81D7-ED26F4652A69@trichotomic.net> <43C42D12.7020309@wxs.nl> <95E5C116-BA8D-42CC-A101-1B83BFEFD35B@trichotomic.net> <43C4BEC7.1050102@wxs.nl> <88E20D3D-0E24-417B-8B35-59B9AA0D27A9@trichotomic.net> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1137054503 2798 80.91.229.2 (12 Jan 2006 08:28:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 08:28:23 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Thu Jan 12 09:28:19 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ewxod-0000SB-3r for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:28:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19FCE127CB; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:28:14 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 13572-03; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:28:12 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 514B1127B8; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:28:12 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E66D127B8 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:28:10 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 13526-06-2 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:28:09 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from mail.pragma-ade.net (dsl-212-84-128-085.solcon.nl [212.84.128.85]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 67B53127B5 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:28:09 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from [10.100.1.102] (unverified [10.100.1.102]) by controller-1 (SurgeMail 3.5b3) with ESMTP id 261 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 03:38:34 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users In-Reply-To: <88E20D3D-0E24-417B-8B35-59B9AA0D27A9@trichotomic.net> X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com r=-274017400 X-Authenticated-User: hagen@controller-1 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:25108 Archived-At: David Wooten wrote: > > On Jan 11, 2006, at 12:16 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: > >> David Wooten wrote: >> >>> On Jan 10, 2006, at 1:54 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: >>> >>>> did you remake the format after increasing the memory values? >>> >>> >>> This means texexec --make --all ? >>> >>> I did try the above, but the numbers in the log when running my >>> file do not change. I can only imagine that there is another place >>> to change the memory settings. In my context.cnf, the numbers are >>> identical to yours below, although I did try to raise the >>> font.mem.size.context as we've been discussing. >> >> >> ah, you need to set the values in texmf.cnf! context.cnf is just an >> example (unless you point the TEXMFCNF environment variable to the >> alternative cnf file) >> >> Hans > > > Ah, unfortunately still no luck. I changed the settings in /usr/local/ > teTeX/share/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf, reset the format files with > texconfig init, and for good measure texexec --make --all, but no > change. Am I simply off target somewhere? maybe you have duplicate formats (texconfig does not support engine paths) do the reported mem values change? Hans