From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/25371 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: \uchar and italics question Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 11:42:49 +0100 Message-ID: <43CF6D29.9060909@wxs.nl> References: <0CF2F7B4-CF66-4F9C-97BA-C76E727CD56A@zonnet.nl> <6faad9f00601180410x23782c97h70a01b9734d08ce7@mail.gmail.com> <43CE4F18.9070205@wxs.nl> <5F9D5692-2B66-467D-B9D7-A56925B29158@zonnet.nl> <43CECEBD.7030404@wxs.nl> <38818B77-53E9-4526-8D24-8759360B515D@zonnet.nl> <43CF5F35.2020103@wxs.nl> <36EA006B-4A65-4204-8642-B1BD967246FD@zonnet.nl> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1137667399 23083 80.91.229.2 (19 Jan 2006 10:43:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 10:43:19 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Thu Jan 19 11:43:14 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EzXFt-0007Rv-Mh for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 11:43:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45C88127A7; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 11:43:01 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 26895-01; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 11:42:58 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E54B212820; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 11:42:57 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B22412820 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 11:42:56 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 26870-03 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 11:42:55 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from mail.pragma-ade.net (dsl-212-84-128-085.solcon.nl [212.84.128.85]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id F39B1127A7 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 11:42:54 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from [10.100.1.102] (unverified [10.100.1.102]) by controller-1 (SurgeMail 3.5b3) with ESMTP id 1497 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 05:54:07 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users In-Reply-To: <36EA006B-4A65-4204-8642-B1BD967246FD@zonnet.nl> X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com r=-274017400 X-Authenticated-User: hagen@controller-1 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:25371 Archived-At: sjoerd siebinga wrote: > Hi Hans, > > On 19 Jan 2006, at 10:43, Hans Hagen wrote: > >> can you test with: >> >> >> \unexpanded\def\unicodeglyph#1#2% watch the double mapping >> >> =EF=BF=BD{\begingroup >> >> =EF=BF=BD \getvalue{@@\currentucharmapping\strippedcsname\uchar}{#1}{#= 2}% >> >> =EF=BF=BD \bodyfontsize\unicodescale\bodyfontsize >> >> =EF=BF=BD \font\unicodefont=3D\truefontname{\unicodestyle\unicodeone} >> >> =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD at \currentfontscale\bodyfontsize >> >> =EF=BF=BD \unicodestrut >> >> =EF=BF=BD\unicodefont\unicodecharcommand{\char\unicodetwo\relax}% >> >> =EF=BF=BD \endgroup} >> >> >> i'll change the handlers in not applying a strut by default >> > > This seems to do the trick. The bold glyphs look fine. There is=20 > however one oddity =EF=BF=BDin italics=EF=BF=BDwith the circumflex and = caron on=20 > capitals and the macron in general. They are so vague that they are=20 > hardly visible. that's a font characteristic Hans