From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/26025 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Peter Rolf Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: fields (widgets) in PDF layer Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:14:21 +0100 Message-ID: <43F63CAD.9080607@gmx.net> References: <43F5FF49.9030603@gmx.net> <43F621FE.7000600@wxs.nl> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1140210950 23635 80.91.229.2 (17 Feb 2006 21:15:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:15:50 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Fri Feb 17 22:15:48 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FACx9-0007hU-Pt for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:15:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EDDE12795; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:15:46 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 30685-03; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:15:42 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CADC412778; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:15:41 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4463912778 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:15:40 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 30353-05-4 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:15:39 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 10AB412772 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:15:38 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2006 21:15:38 -0000 Original-Received: from i577B839B.versanet.de (EHLO [192.168.1.3]) [87.123.131.155] by mail.gmx.net (mp033) with SMTP; 17 Feb 2006 22:15:38 +0100 X-Authenticated: #24293357 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users In-Reply-To: <43F621FE.7000600@wxs.nl> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:26025 Archived-At: Hans Hagen wrote: > Peter Rolf wrote: >> Hi all! >> >> I've searched for an answer some time ago >> >> http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20051230.132510.4dba9fed.en.html >> >> Meanwhile I've solved the problem and the solution is quite simple. Only >> some minor changes are needed, to bound the state of fields to the state >> of their surrounding PDF layer. I attached a 'small' example file and >> two diff files for patching. >> >> So what is this good for? For example think about multilayered control >> fields (stack), which appear in the form of a tabular box (one tab >> active at a time). Every tab can contain any kind of interactive field. >> No more mouse interaction (and ugly gfx glitches) with hidden fields, if >> the surrounding PDF layer is switched off. >> > So what you propose is to have an automatic relationship between layers > and widgets? yes. everything between a \startproperty[layer] and \stopproperty belongs to this layer. if the layer is deactivated, everything should not only be hidden but also be inactive. this is the only way to stack layers with interactive elements. >> To Hans: >> - Dunno if the name \currentPDFlayer is o.k., or if there is a better >> place for it's (re)initialisation. >> - The fields are still active (only hidden), if the outer layer is >> deactivated (nested). Is the outer layer not part of the child layers >> OCMG? Reading the PDF reference manual is much harder than reading your >> sources... >> So it's up to you, if and how this is added. >> > What you do basically comes down to having a default connection between the layers key of widgets and the current layer. This is ok but need to be a configurable feature. I'll think about it. > o.k. thx. > Hans > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE > Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands > tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com > | www.pragma-pod.nl > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ > ntg-context mailing list > ntg-context@ntg.nl > http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context > >