* display math overcrowded with $$..$$
@ 2006-03-17 5:44 Sanjoy Mahajan
2006-03-17 9:14 ` Taco Hoekwater
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sanjoy Mahajan @ 2006-03-17 5:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
The following file produces a overcrowded displayed formula (the
integral sign almost touches the line of text below it):
\starttext
$$\ln(1+x)=\int_1^{1+x}{dt\over t}$$ is very useful.
The logarithm is the area of regions A and B.
\stoptext
But if I use \startformula..\stopformula instead of $$..$$, then the
spacing is fine. I make the pdf file with 'texexec --pdf try.tex' and
see the problem on my laptop (Debian testing/unstable i386, teTeX
3.0-14 + cm-super font package):
texexec : TeXExec 5.2.4 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1997-2005
texutil : TeXUtil 9.0.0 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1992-2004
tex : pdfeTeX, 3.141592-1.21a-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.4)
context : ver: 2005.01.31
cont-en : ver: 2005.01.31 fmt: 2006.2.18 mes: english
I thought a conTeXt upgrade might fix it, but I haven't (yet!) won the
battle with teTeX and map and encoding files. However, the live ConTeXt
(2006.02.15) on the Wiki displays, no pun intended, the same spacing
problem.
Should I not use $$..$$ for display math? I'm learning context as I
convert my plain tex + eplain files. The Wiki page on Math
<http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Math> says that context inherits its math
from plain TeX, which implies that $$ should work. However, no examples
on the page use $$, so maybe I shouldn't be so presumptuous.
Although I'd like $$..$$ and \startformula..\stopformula to be
equivalent, I can write a script to convert plain TeX $$..$$
constructions to \{start,stop}formula
-Sanjoy
`Never underestimate the evil of which men of power are capable.'
--Bertrand Russell, _War Crimes in Vietnam_, chapter 1.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: display math overcrowded with $$..$$
2006-03-17 5:44 display math overcrowded with $$..$$ Sanjoy Mahajan
@ 2006-03-17 9:14 ` Taco Hoekwater
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Taco Hoekwater @ 2006-03-17 9:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
>
> Should I not use $$..$$ for display math?
The official answer to that is: no.
But if all you ever use is plain displays, you can manually
restore the four above&below skips to plain-compatible values.
(let as an exercise to the reader for extra discouragement)
Cheers, Taco
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-03-17 9:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-03-17 5:44 display math overcrowded with $$..$$ Sanjoy Mahajan
2006-03-17 9:14 ` Taco Hoekwater
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).