From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/26644 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: beta Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 19:05:32 +0200 Message-ID: <442C0FDC.1050908@wxs.nl> References: <442AAC0E.40906@wxs.nl> <442BA583.9030306@elvenkind.com> <442BE82D.1060903@elvenkind.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1143738377 28157 80.91.229.2 (30 Mar 2006 17:06:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 17:06:17 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Thu Mar 30 19:06:06 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FP0af-0000Op-B3 for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 19:05:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AB6A127BC; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 19:05:44 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 13986-01; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 19:05:38 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D957C1279D; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 19:05:37 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD5311279D for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 19:05:36 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 13894-03-2 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 19:05:35 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mail.pragma-ade.net (dsl-212-84-128-085.solcon.nl [212.84.128.85]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id E962E12796 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 19:05:34 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from [10.100.1.102] (unverified [10.100.1.102]) by controller-1 (SurgeMail 3.5b3) with ESMTP id 10452 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 21:05:34 +0400 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users In-Reply-To: X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com r=-274017400 X-Authenticated-User: hagen@controller-1 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:26644 Archived-At: Aditya Mahajan wrote: > On Thu, 30 Mar 2006, Taco Hoekwater wrote: > >> Aditya Mahajan wrote: >> >>> <--- On Mar 30, Taco Hoekwater wrote ---> >>> >>> >>>> * The broken eq reference (at least IMO this is a bug) >>>> \starttext >>>> \placeformula[eqn1] >>>> \startformula \startalign[n=1] a\\ \stopalign \stopformula >>>> See \in[eqn1] >>>> \stoptext >>>> >>> I am not sure that this is a bug. Infact, I am not behaviour is >>> expected. >>> \placeformula[eq1] >>> \startformula \startalign[n=1] >>> a \\ >>> b \\ >>> \stopalign \stopformula >>> What should \in[eqn1] refer to? The first eqn, the second, or both? >>> >> Both, perhaps. But it could as well take the first one, or the last. >> My rationale is: if there is a label given by the user, then >> referring to that should resolve into something that is a valid link. >> It is definately inconsistent to discard a supplied label because it's >> contents may be unresolvable. >> > > I agree on that. The label must refer to something. However, explaining > what it refers to can quickly get confusing. The numbering should remain > consistent with or without the label. > > \placeformula[eq1] > \startformula \startalign > \NC a \NC b \NR > \NC c \NC d \NR[+] > \stopalign \stopformula > The first equation should not be numbered. But then this is something like > the "ugly loose label" in latex. > > And what about > \placeformula[eq1] > \startformula \startalign > \NC a \NC b \NR > \NC c \NC d \NR > \stopalign \stopformula > > The numbering should be consistent with or without the label. Which means > that there should be no numbering. What should the label refer to now? > i've now changed the code so that in \placeformula[eq1]... \NC[+] the number is refered to as eq1 \placeformula[eq1]... \NC[eq2] here eq1 gets lost, while \placeformula... \NC[eq3] is the prefered way Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------