Re: Problems with Standalone distribution

Re: Problems with Standalone distribution

[wwl]

> Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:00:41 +0200
> From: Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl>
> Subject: Re: [NTG-context] Problems with Standalone distribution
> To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
> Message-ID: <442D3609.4070009@wxs.nl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
> 
> wwl@musensturm.de wrote:
> >>> First Problem (may be the mother of all the others):
> >>>
> >>> The Batch-Files 'cdemo.bat' and 'cscite.bat' are using for example
> >>> "%~s1" for the first placeholder on the commandline.
> >>>
> >>> My Windowssystem (ME) doesn't understand this.
> >>>
> >>> Are there other Batch-Files that work on older commandoprozessors
> >>> to download?
> >>>   
> >>>       
> >> hm, not on my machine; you can try:
> >>
> >> @echo off
> >> usr\local\context\cscite.bat
> >>     
> >
> > The same problems with cscite.bat.
> > As I said, I can change these two batch-files. But I am not shure if
> > my problems derive from this.
> >   
> well, test it -)

ok! I have modified the batch-files.

Next Problems: 

texexec.ini is not found in 'context\config'
I copyed it in 'scripts\context\perl'
now it is found. 

'texexec --verbose' tries to compile all the files in the aktuel 
path.

but

'texmfstart texexec.pl --verbose' works ok.

same with

'texexec --make --all' doesn't work

but 

'texmfstart texexec.pl --make --all' works!

formatfiles will generatet under '.\pdfetex' relativ to the aktual 
path.

Wolfgang

Re: Problems with Standalone distribution

[wwl]

> Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 00:26:12 +0200
> From: Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl>
> Subject: Re: [NTG-context] ntg-context Digest, Vol 22, Issue 1
> To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
> Message-ID: <4431A104.9000001@wxs.nl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
> 
> wwl@musensturm.de wrote:
> >> texexec.ini is not found in 'context\config'
> >> I copyed it in 'scripts\context\perl'
> >> now it is found. 
> >
> > Is this normal? Or is this a symptome of the problem I am looking
> > for?
> >   
> it depends on what system you use; the settinsg default to 
> tetex/fptex/gwtex so in that case no ini is needed

As I said, I work with the standalone distri?
And I thought, the binaries are from fptex, right?
And if both texexec.ini's are removed:

texexec complains: 

  warning: texexec.ini not found, try 'texexec --verbose'

(the same with texexec --verbose)
 
> newtexexec.rb (which will replace texexec.pl) has no ini file but
> uses 
> some heuristics to determine what environment it runs in
> >  
> >   
> >> 'texexec --verbose' tries to compile all the files in the aktuel
> >> path.
> >>
> >> but
> >>
> >> 'texmfstart texexec.pl --verbose' works ok.
> >>
> >> same with
> >>
> >> 'texexec --make --all' doesn't work
> >>
> >> but 
> >>
> >> 'texmfstart texexec.pl --make --all' works!
> >>     
> good

upps?

texexec (without parameters)

compiles cscite.bat! Why?

 
> on windows: you need to associate the pl suffix to perl
> on linux you need to make  texexec into a script (suffixless)
> 
> on both you can best use texmfstart to launch the scripts since
> that's 
> upward compatible (and in some respects this call is more clever);
> if 
> needef you can create stubs with texmfstart (see manual)

This works!

But next Problem:

pdfetex can not find pk-fonts.

I have written: 

PKFONTS = .;$TEXMF/fonts/pk//

in 'texmf.cnf'

font-file lies in

texmf-project/fonts/pk/ricoh/local/msl/msl50.pk

what else can I do?

Wolfgang

Re: Problems with Standalone distribution

[Hans Hagen]

wwl@musensturm.de wrote:
> As I said, I work with the standalone distri?
>   
the minimal or the complete windows version (including scite etc)
> And I thought, the binaries are from fptex, right?
>   
sure
> And if both texexec.ini's are removed:
>
> texexec complains: 
>
>   warning: texexec.ini not found, try 'texexec --verbose'
>
> (the same with texexec --verbose)
>   
but that should normally be no problem

>  
>   
>> newtexexec.rb (which will replace texexec.pl) has no ini file but
>> uses 
>> some heuristics to determine what environment it runs in
>>     
>>>  
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> 'texexec --verbose' tries to compile all the files in the aktuel
>>>> path.
>>>>
>>>> but
>>>>
>>>> 'texmfstart texexec.pl --verbose' works ok.
>>>>
>>>> same with
>>>>
>>>> 'texexec --make --all' doesn't work
>>>>
>>>> but 
>>>>
>>>> 'texmfstart texexec.pl --make --all' works!
>>>>     
>>>>         
>> good
>>     
>
> upps?
>
> texexec (without parameters)
>
> compiles cscite.bat! Why?
>   
strange indeed

can you run "texmfstart texexec" and see what happens then
>  
>   
>> on windows: you need to associate the pl suffix to perl
>> on linux you need to make  texexec into a script (suffixless)
>>
>> on both you can best use texmfstart to launch the scripts since
>> that's 
>> upward compatible (and in some respects this call is more clever);
>> if 
>> needef you can create stubs with texmfstart (see manual)
>>     
>
> This works!
>
> But next Problem:
>
> pdfetex can not find pk-fonts.
>
> I have written: 
>
> PKFONTS = .;$TEXMF/fonts/pk//
>
> in 'texmf.cnf'
>
> font-file lies in
>
> texmf-project/fonts/pk/ricoh/local/msl/msl50.pk
>
> what else can I do?
>   
ok, that's another problem (once solved you know a bit about tex and fonts) ... it looks like there is a problem with locating fonts ... what 
font is that: msl50 ? 

(the minimal distribution does not have such a font)  

Hans 


-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
              Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
     tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                             | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Re: Problems with Standalone distribution

[wwl]

> > First Problem (may be the mother of all the others):
> >
> > The Batch-Files 'cdemo.bat' and 'cscite.bat' are using for example
> > "%~s1" for the first placeholder on the commandline.
> >
> > My Windowssystem (ME) doesn't understand this.
> >
> > Are there other Batch-Files that work on older commandoprozessors to
> > download?
> >   
> hm, not on my machine; you can try:
> 
> @echo off
> usr\local\context\cscite.bat

The same problems with cscite.bat.
As I said, I can change these two batch-files. But I am not shure if 
my problems derive from this.

 
> (i dunno if there's a way to test if we run me)
> 
> > A second question:
> >
> > There exists an directory 'usr\local\context\tex\texmf\texmf' which
> > contains fontinformation to one single fontfamily 'cb'.
> >
> > Is this ok: 'texmf' under 'texmf'? And why ist this there?
> >   
> thats a bug (i thought that i had solved it -)

Should I move this subtree one level higher or delete it?

Wolfgang

Re: Problems with Standalone distribution

[Hans Hagen]

wwl@musensturm.de wrote:
>>> First Problem (may be the mother of all the others):
>>>
>>> The Batch-Files 'cdemo.bat' and 'cscite.bat' are using for example
>>> "%~s1" for the first placeholder on the commandline.
>>>
>>> My Windowssystem (ME) doesn't understand this.
>>>
>>> Are there other Batch-Files that work on older commandoprozessors to
>>> download?
>>>   
>>>       
>> hm, not on my machine; you can try:
>>
>> @echo off
>> usr\local\context\cscite.bat
>>     
>
> The same problems with cscite.bat.
> As I said, I can change these two batch-files. But I am not shure if 
> my problems derive from this.
>   
well, test it -)
>  
>   
>> (i dunno if there's a way to test if we run me)
>>
>>     
>>> A second question:
>>>
>>> There exists an directory 'usr\local\context\tex\texmf\texmf' which
>>> contains fontinformation to one single fontfamily 'cb'.
>>>
>>> Is this ok: 'texmf' under 'texmf'? And why ist this there?
>>>   
>>>       
>> thats a bug (i thought that i had solved it -)
>>     
>
> Should I move this subtree one level higher or delete it?
>   
one higher

Hans

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
              Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
     tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                             | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Problems with Standalone distribution

[wwl]

Hallo!

Some months ago I have downloaded 'mswincontext.zip'.

There were a lot of Problems and I tried to solve them.
I could finally compile some files. But then I get new problems and 
so I decided to start over and ask the list for help.

First Problem (may be the mother of all the others):

The Batch-Files 'cdemo.bat' and 'cscite.bat' are using for example 
"%~s1" for the first placeholder on the commandline.

My Windowssystem (ME) doesn't understand this.

Are there other Batch-Files that work on older commandoprozessors to 
download?

A second question:

There exists an directory 'usr\local\context\tex\texmf\texmf' which 
contains fontinformation to one single fontfamily 'cb'.

Is this ok: 'texmf' under 'texmf'? And why ist this there?

Wolfgang

Re: Problems with Standalone distribution

[Hans Hagen]

wwl@musensturm.de wrote:
> Hallo!
>
> Some months ago I have downloaded 'mswincontext.zip'.
>
> There were a lot of Problems and I tried to solve them.
> I could finally compile some files. But then I get new problems and 
> so I decided to start over and ask the list for help.
>
> First Problem (may be the mother of all the others):
>
> The Batch-Files 'cdemo.bat' and 'cscite.bat' are using for example 
> "%~s1" for the first placeholder on the commandline.
>
> My Windowssystem (ME) doesn't understand this.
>
> Are there other Batch-Files that work on older commandoprozessors to 
> download?
>   
hm, not on my machine; you can try:

@echo off

usr\local\context\cscite.bat

(i dunno if there's a way to test if we run me)

> A second question:
>
> There exists an directory 'usr\local\context\tex\texmf\texmf' which 
> contains fontinformation to one single fontfamily 'cb'.
>
> Is this ok: 'texmf' under 'texmf'? And why ist this there?
>   
thats a bug (i thought that i had solved it -)

Hans

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
              Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
     tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                             | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------