From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/26952 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: about the default bullets of itemized lists Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2006 15:08:19 +0200 Message-ID: <4437B5C3.3060504@wxs.nl> References: <40868C9A-6E21-41F1-8F38-1A9672BA81B8@mac.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1144506494 21588 80.91.229.2 (8 Apr 2006 14:28:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 14:28:14 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sat Apr 08 16:28:12 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FSEPz-0007PX-NU for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2006 16:28:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4369F1277B; Sat, 8 Apr 2006 16:28:03 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 28965-01; Sat, 8 Apr 2006 16:28:02 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C766012795; Sat, 8 Apr 2006 15:08:20 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB5CE12795 for ; Sat, 8 Apr 2006 15:08:19 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 27610-04-5 for ; Sat, 8 Apr 2006 15:08:17 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mail.pragma-ade.net (dsl-212-84-128-085.solcon.nl [212.84.128.85]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 0BAFB1277B for ; Sat, 8 Apr 2006 15:08:17 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from [10.100.1.102] (unverified [10.100.1.102]) by controller-1 (SurgeMail 3.5b3) with ESMTP id 11704 for ; Sat, 08 Apr 2006 17:08:16 +0400 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users In-Reply-To: <40868C9A-6E21-41F1-8F38-1A9672BA81B8@mac.com> X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com r=-274017400 X-Authenticated-User: hagen@controller-1 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:26952 Archived-At: Dalyoung Jeong wrote: > Dear all, > > It is not a big problem, but I don't know why this curious thing > happened. > > A few days ago, I updated ConTeXt and made a format file for XeConTeXt. > I run a file which was compiled well before and got a strange > results: at this time. > all the bullets of the itemized lists are gone(no bullets). > > After I changed the first \startitemize to \startitemize[1] only, > then all the itemized lists in the whole text had a bullet again. If > I changed [1] to [2] and [3], it disappeared again(including bullets > for \head). > Is this normal? or are there something wrong in my setup or in my > document? > how exactly does your test file look? Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------