* Fieldstack Walk @ 2006-04-18 9:09 Michal Kvasnička 2006-04-18 9:28 ` Peter Rolf 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Michal Kvasnička @ 2006-04-18 9:09 UTC (permalink / raw) Good morning. I use a fieldstack in my presentation. I'd like to go to the next frame when I click on the figure. I tried this: \definefieldstack[fgolds3] [sgolds1,sgolds3a,sgolds3b,sgolds3c,sgolds3] [frame=off,clickin=JS(Walk_Field{fgolds3})] \definesymbol[sgolds1][{\externalfigure[golds1]}] \definesymbol[sgolds3a][{\externalfigure[golds3a]}] \definesymbol[sgolds3b][{\externalfigure[golds3b]}] \definesymbol[sgolds3c][{\externalfigure[golds3c]}] \definesymbol[sgolds3][{\externalfigure[golds3]}] \placefigure[here]{none}{\fieldstack[fgolds3]} I thought that `clickin=JS(Walk_Field{fgolds3})' makes precisely what I need, but it does not. How can I make it work? With many thanks yours Michal Kvasnicka ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Fieldstack Walk 2006-04-18 9:09 Fieldstack Walk Michal Kvasnička @ 2006-04-18 9:28 ` Peter Rolf [not found] ` <4444B1C9.1090109@econ.muni.cz> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Peter Rolf @ 2006-04-18 9:28 UTC (permalink / raw) Michal Kvasnička wrote: > Good morning. > > I use a fieldstack in my presentation. I'd like to go to the next frame > when I click on the figure. I tried this: > > \definefieldstack[fgolds3] > [sgolds1,sgolds3a,sgolds3b,sgolds3c,sgolds3] > [frame=off,clickin=JS(Walk_Field{fgolds3})] > \definesymbol[sgolds1][{\externalfigure[golds1]}] > \definesymbol[sgolds3a][{\externalfigure[golds3a]}] > \definesymbol[sgolds3b][{\externalfigure[golds3b]}] > \definesymbol[sgolds3c][{\externalfigure[golds3c]}] > \definesymbol[sgolds3][{\externalfigure[golds3]}] > \placefigure[here]{none}{\fieldstack[fgolds3]} > just guessing: first define the symbols, then define the fieldstack. Hope that helps, Peter > I thought that `clickin=JS(Walk_Field{fgolds3})' makes precisely what I > need, but it does not. How can I make it work? > > With many thanks yours > Michal Kvasnicka > > _______________________________________________ > ntg-context mailing list > ntg-context@ntg.nl > http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context > > _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <4444B1C9.1090109@econ.muni.cz>]
* Re: Fieldstack Walk [not found] ` <4444B1C9.1090109@econ.muni.cz> @ 2006-04-18 10:18 ` Peter Rolf [not found] ` <4444B966.5020108@gmx.net> 1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Peter Rolf @ 2006-04-18 10:18 UTC (permalink / raw) Hi Michal, Michal Kvasnička wrote: > Hi Peter, > > thank for your answer, but it doesn't help. First, it seems the order is > not important in ConTeXt. Second, the fieldstack works well. I can even > make it walk with \goto{...}[JS(Walk_Field{fgolds3})]. The only thing > that doesn't work is that I can't click on the figure to make it walk. > I see :) Can you try the following: \definefieldstack[fgolds3] [sgolds1,sgolds3a,sgolds3b,sgolds3c,sgolds3] [frame=off,option=,clickin=JS(Walk_Field{fgolds3})] ^^^^^^ option is "readonly" as default (see \dodofieldstack in core-fld.tex), so there can be no interaction (if I'm not again completely wrong). Greets, Peter P.S.: don't know why this mail was replied to your mail address and not to ntg-context... > Thanks anyway. > M.K. > >>> I use a fieldstack in my presentation. I'd like to go to the next >>> frame when I click on the figure. I tried this: >>> >>> \definefieldstack[fgolds3] >>> [sgolds1,sgolds3a,sgolds3b,sgolds3c,sgolds3] >>> [frame=off,clickin=JS(Walk_Field{fgolds3})] >>> \definesymbol[sgolds1][{\externalfigure[golds1]}] >>> \definesymbol[sgolds3a][{\externalfigure[golds3a]}] >>> \definesymbol[sgolds3b][{\externalfigure[golds3b]}] >>> \definesymbol[sgolds3c][{\externalfigure[golds3c]}] >>> \definesymbol[sgolds3][{\externalfigure[golds3]}] >>> \placefigure[here]{none}{\fieldstack[fgolds3]} >>> >>> >> just guessing: >> >> first define the symbols, then define the fieldstack. >> >> Hope that helps, >> >> Peter >> >> >> >> >>> I thought that `clickin=JS(Walk_Field{fgolds3})' makes precisely what >>> I need, but it does not. How can I make it work? >>> >>> With many thanks yours >>> Michal Kvasnicka >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ntg-context mailing list >>> ntg-context@ntg.nl >>> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context >>> >>> >>> > > _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <4444B966.5020108@gmx.net>]
* Re: Fieldstack Walk [not found] ` <4444B966.5020108@gmx.net> @ 2006-04-18 10:39 ` Michal Kvasnička 2006-04-18 11:55 ` Peter Rolf 2006-04-22 20:01 ` Peter Rolf 0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Michal Kvasnička @ 2006-04-18 10:39 UTC (permalink / raw) Good afternoon. Many thanks, this solves the problem -- at least partially. The frames are `walking' now, but new problems appeared. I found that when I set `clickin=...', it is set it automatically to `clickout' as well, so one mouse click runs the JavaScript code twice. So I've set it this way: \definefieldstack[fgolds2] [sgolds1,sgolds2a,sgolds2b,sgolds2c,sgolds2d,sgolds2] [frame=off,option=,clickout=JS(Walk_Field{fgolds3}),clickin=] It's better, but I found that now frames are walking in a strange order. It is rather puzzling, since when it is invoked by \goto{...}[JS(...)], it works well. Moreover, it does different things at AdobeReader 7.x under Linux, and Acrobat 4.x under Windoze. Can you help me to solve it? Many thanks once more. M.K. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Fieldstack Walk 2006-04-18 10:39 ` Michal Kvasnička @ 2006-04-18 11:55 ` Peter Rolf 2006-04-18 21:35 ` Peter Rolf 2006-04-22 20:01 ` Peter Rolf 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Peter Rolf @ 2006-04-18 11:55 UTC (permalink / raw) Michal Kvasnička wrote: > Good afternoon. > > Many thanks, this solves the problem -- at least partially. The frames > are `walking' now, but new problems appeared. I found that when I set > `clickin=...', it is set it automatically to `clickout' as well, so one > mouse click runs the JavaScript code twice. So I've set it this way: > > \definefieldstack[fgolds2] > [sgolds1,sgolds2a,sgolds2b,sgolds2c,sgolds2d,sgolds2] > [frame=off,option=,clickout=JS(Walk_Field{fgolds3}),clickin=] > > It's better, but I found that now frames are walking in a strange order. > It is rather puzzling, since when it is invoked by \goto{...}[JS(...)], > it works well. Moreover, it does different things at AdobeReader 7.x > under Linux, and Acrobat 4.x under Windoze. > > Can you help me to solve it? Mhh, looks like you are going new ways with making the fieldstack interactive (maybe not intended?). Sorry, but I can't help you any further in this direction. Another possibility that I can think of is to add an invisible button field (same dimensions) behind a normal fieldstack, that calls JS(Walk_Field...). Should cause no conflicts with the readonly (non interactive) fieldstack [but this is untested!]. You can simply check this with a button beside the fieldstack and if this works ok, you can use \nointerlineskip \smashedvbox{YOUR WALKBUTTON FIELD}% \placefigure[here]{none}{\fieldstack[fgolds3]} to place it under your fieldstack. HTH, Peter > Many thanks once more. > M.K. > > _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Fieldstack Walk 2006-04-18 11:55 ` Peter Rolf @ 2006-04-18 21:35 ` Peter Rolf 2006-04-18 22:03 ` Sanjoy Mahajan 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Peter Rolf @ 2006-04-18 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw) [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2147 bytes --] Peter Rolf wrote: > Michal Kvasnička wrote: >> Good afternoon. >> >> Many thanks, this solves the problem -- at least partially. The frames >> are `walking' now, but new problems appeared. I found that when I set >> `clickin=...', it is set it automatically to `clickout' as well, so one >> mouse click runs the JavaScript code twice. So I've set it this way: >> >> \definefieldstack[fgolds2] >> [sgolds1,sgolds2a,sgolds2b,sgolds2c,sgolds2d,sgolds2] >> [frame=off,option=,clickout=JS(Walk_Field{fgolds3}),clickin=] >> >> It's better, but I found that now frames are walking in a strange order. >> It is rather puzzling, since when it is invoked by \goto{...}[JS(...)], >> it works well. Moreover, it does different things at AdobeReader 7.x >> under Linux, and Acrobat 4.x under Windoze. >> >> Can you help me to solve it? > > Mhh, looks like you are going new ways with making the fieldstack > interactive (maybe not intended?). Sorry, but I can't help you any > further in this direction. > > Another possibility that I can think of is to add an invisible button > field (same dimensions) behind a normal fieldstack, that calls > JS(Walk_Field...). Should cause no conflicts with the readonly (non > interactive) fieldstack [but this is untested!]. You can simply check > this with a button beside the fieldstack and if this works ok, you can use > > \nointerlineskip > \smashedvbox{YOUR WALKBUTTON FIELD}% > \placefigure[here]{none}{\fieldstack[fgolds3]} > > to place it under your fieldstack. > Bad news... I just tested this and it works only as long as you don't stack the button and the fieldstack. The only solution I have found, is to seperate the interaction button into a pdf layer. Things work as desired (you need a context version not older than 2 month), but there are still some problems with spurious spaces. Example is attached. Greets, Peter > HTH, Peter > > >> Many thanks once more. >> M.K. >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > ntg-context mailing list > ntg-context@ntg.nl > http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context [-- Attachment #2: test.tex --] [-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1107 bytes --] % interface=en output=pdftex % Time-stamp: <Dienstag, 18 April 2006 23:16:39; test.tex> % \setupinteraction[state=start] \setupcolors[state=start] \starttext \switchtobodyfont[ss,32pt] \def\FS#1{\framed[width=4cm,height=4cm]{#1}}% \definesymbol[empty][] \definesymbol[sgolds1][\FS{A}] \definesymbol[sgolds3a][\FS{B}] \definesymbol[sgolds3b][\FS{C}] \definesymbol[sgolds3c][\FS{D}] \definesymbol[sgolds3][\FS{E}] \setupfield[hidden][width=4cm,height=4cm, % frame=off, framecolor=blue, clickin=JS(Walk_Field{fgolds3})] \definefield[Walk][check][hidden][empty][empty] \definefieldstack[fgolds3] [sgolds1,sgolds3a,sgolds3b,sgolds3c,sgolds3] [frame=off,clickin=JS(Walk_Field{fgolds3})] \defineproperty[interaction][layer][title=walkfield, state=start] %\showmakeup % can't get rid of the spurious apaces... \vbox{\forgetall \nointerlineskip \smashedvbox{\fieldstack[fgolds3]}% % \startproperty[interaction]% \nointerlineskip \field[Walk] \stopproperty% } \stoptext %%% Local Variables: %%% mode: context %%% TeX-master: "" %%% End: [-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 139 bytes --] _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Fieldstack Walk 2006-04-18 21:35 ` Peter Rolf @ 2006-04-18 22:03 ` Sanjoy Mahajan 2006-04-19 8:41 ` Peter Rolf 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Sanjoy Mahajan @ 2006-04-18 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw) > there are still some problems with spurious spaces. Just on the off chance that it's the same problem I had with some section numbers getting an extra space before them (in pdf mode): If you are running pdf(e)tex 1.21, you might need the patch below; then remake the formats. I think (but haven't tried it myself) that pdftex 1.30 wants the original spacings (i.e. don't apply the patch in that case). See <http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2006/017388.html> diff -r f6897ee163d2 -r 5ff7b6430984 tex/context/base/enco-pfr.tex --- a/tex/context/base/enco-pfr.tex Fri Apr 14 14:45:01 2006 -0400 +++ b/tex/context/base/enco-pfr.tex Fri Apr 14 14:51:47 2006 -0400 @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ \else\ifcsname\pdffontfileresource\endcsname % is there a resource already included \doifsomething\pdffontfileresource - {\pdfobj reserveobjnum {}% + {\pdfobj reserveobjnum{}% \setxvalue\pdffontresource{\the\pdflastobj}% \flushatshipout{\dododoincludepdffontresource{\currentencoding}}}% % \doglobal\appendetoks @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ {\expandafter\ifx\csname\pdffontresource\endcsname\relax \expandafter\ifx\csname\pdffontfileresource\endcsname\relax\else \doifsomething\pdffontfileresource - {\pdfobj reserveobjnum {}% + {\pdfobj reserveobjnum{}% \setxvalue\pdffontresource{\the\pdflastobj}% \flushatshipout{\dododoincludepdffontresource{\currentencoding}}}% % \doglobal\appendetoks ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Fieldstack Walk 2006-04-18 22:03 ` Sanjoy Mahajan @ 2006-04-19 8:41 ` Peter Rolf 2006-04-19 11:49 ` Sanjoy Mahajan 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Peter Rolf @ 2006-04-19 8:41 UTC (permalink / raw) Thanks Sanjoy for pointing this out. Both problems are still *unfixed* (beta from 17.04). Unfortunately fixing them doesn't solve my problem. I'll try it again later. Maybe I was to tired yesterday to solve this and the error is on my side... Greets, Peter Sanjoy Mahajan wrote: >> there are still some problems with spurious spaces. > > Just on the off chance that it's the same problem I had with some section > numbers getting an extra space before them (in pdf mode): > > If you are running pdf(e)tex 1.21, you might need the patch below; > then remake the formats. I think (but haven't tried it myself) that > pdftex 1.30 wants the original spacings (i.e. don't apply the patch in > that case). See > <http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2006/017388.html> > > diff -r f6897ee163d2 -r 5ff7b6430984 tex/context/base/enco-pfr.tex > --- a/tex/context/base/enco-pfr.tex Fri Apr 14 14:45:01 2006 -0400 > +++ b/tex/context/base/enco-pfr.tex Fri Apr 14 14:51:47 2006 -0400 > @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ > \else\ifcsname\pdffontfileresource\endcsname > % is there a resource already included > \doifsomething\pdffontfileresource > - {\pdfobj reserveobjnum {}% > + {\pdfobj reserveobjnum{}% > \setxvalue\pdffontresource{\the\pdflastobj}% > \flushatshipout{\dododoincludepdffontresource{\currentencoding}}}% > % \doglobal\appendetoks > @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ > {\expandafter\ifx\csname\pdffontresource\endcsname\relax > \expandafter\ifx\csname\pdffontfileresource\endcsname\relax\else > \doifsomething\pdffontfileresource > - {\pdfobj reserveobjnum {}% > + {\pdfobj reserveobjnum{}% > \setxvalue\pdffontresource{\the\pdflastobj}% > \flushatshipout{\dododoincludepdffontresource{\currentencoding}}}% > % \doglobal\appendetoks > > > > _______________________________________________ > ntg-context mailing list > ntg-context@ntg.nl > http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Fieldstack Walk 2006-04-19 8:41 ` Peter Rolf @ 2006-04-19 11:49 ` Sanjoy Mahajan 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Sanjoy Mahajan @ 2006-04-19 11:49 UTC (permalink / raw) From: Peter Rolf <indiego@gmx.net> > Both problems are still *unfixed* (beta from 17.04). The one I pointed out doesn't have an obvious solution since (I think) the reserveobjnum spacing change breaks with pdftex 1.30 but is needed with pdftex 1.21. I guess the magic line could be wrapped in a test for pdftexminorversion or something like that (and that wrapped in a test for using pdftex at all). -Sanjoy `Never underestimate the evil of which men of power are capable.' --Bertrand Russell, _War Crimes in Vietnam_, chapter 1. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Fieldstack Walk 2006-04-18 10:39 ` Michal Kvasnička 2006-04-18 11:55 ` Peter Rolf @ 2006-04-22 20:01 ` Peter Rolf 2006-04-22 20:09 ` Peter Rolf 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Peter Rolf @ 2006-04-22 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw) [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1020 bytes --] Michal Kvasnička wrote: > Good afternoon. > > Many thanks, this solves the problem -- at least partially. The frames > are `walking' now, but new problems appeared. I found that when I set > `clickin=...', it is set it automatically to `clickout' as well, so one > mouse click runs the JavaScript code twice. So I've set it this way: > > \definefieldstack[fgolds2] > [sgolds1,sgolds2a,sgolds2b,sgolds2c,sgolds2d,sgolds2] > [frame=off,option=,clickout=JS(Walk_Field{fgolds3}),clickin=] > > It's better, but I found that now frames are walking in a strange order. > It is rather puzzling, since when it is invoked by \goto{...}[JS(...)], > it works well. Moreover, it does different things at AdobeReader 7.x > under Linux, and Acrobat 4.x under Windoze. > > Can you help me to solve it? Took some time, but it works now. What I don't understand, is the strange behaviour of the offset parameter in this case. See attached file. Greets, Peter > Many thanks once more. > M.K. > > [-- Attachment #2: test.tex --] [-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1310 bytes --] % interface=en output=pdftex % Time-stamp: <Samstag, 22 April 2006 21:53:30; test.tex> % \setupinteraction[state=start] \setupcolors[state=start] \starttext \tracefieldstrue \switchtobodyfont[96pt] \def\FS#1{\framed[width=4cm,height=4cm,strut=no]{\red\bf#1}}% \definesymbol [empty] [] \definesymbol [one] [\FS{1}] \definesymbol [two] [\FS{2}] \definesymbol [three] [\FS{3}] \definesymbol [four] [\FS{4}] \definesymbol [five] [\FS{5}] \setupfield[interaction] [width=4cm,height=4cm, % frame=off, framecolor=blue, offset=none,% default offset causes different positioning of walk button and fieldstack clickin=JS(Walk_Field{sequence})] \definefield[Walk][check][interaction][empty][empty] \definefieldstack[sequence] [one,two,three,four,five] [frame=off, offset=none,% default offset causes different positioning of walk button and fieldstack clickin=JS(Walk_Field{sequence})] \defineproperty[interaction][layer][title=walkfield, state=start] \vbox{\forgetall \nointerlineskip\smashedvbox{\fieldstack[sequence]}% % \startproperty[interaction]% \nointerlineskip\field[Walk] \stopproperty% } \blank[2cm] \showfields \stoptext %%% Local Variables: %%% mode: context %%% TeX-master: "" %%% End: [-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 139 bytes --] _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Fieldstack Walk 2006-04-22 20:01 ` Peter Rolf @ 2006-04-22 20:09 ` Peter Rolf 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Peter Rolf @ 2006-04-22 20:09 UTC (permalink / raw) Peter Rolf wrote: > Michal Kvasnička wrote: >> Good afternoon. >> >> Many thanks, this solves the problem -- at least partially. The frames >> are `walking' now, but new problems appeared. I found that when I set >> `clickin=...', it is set it automatically to `clickout' as well, so one >> mouse click runs the JavaScript code twice. So I've set it this way: >> >> \definefieldstack[fgolds2] >> [sgolds1,sgolds2a,sgolds2b,sgolds2c,sgolds2d,sgolds2] >> [frame=off,option=,clickout=JS(Walk_Field{fgolds3}),clickin=] >> >> It's better, but I found that now frames are walking in a strange order. >> It is rather puzzling, since when it is invoked by \goto{...}[JS(...)], >> it works well. Moreover, it does different things at AdobeReader 7.x >> under Linux, and Acrobat 4.x under Windoze. >> >> Can you help me to solve it? > > Took some time, but it works now. What I don't understand, is the > strange behaviour of the offset parameter in this case. See attached file. > > Greets, Peter > >> Many thanks once more. >> M.K. >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > % interface=en output=pdftex > % Time-stamp: <Samstag, 22 April 2006 21:53:30; test.tex> > % > \setupinteraction[state=start] > \setupcolors[state=start] > > \starttext > > \tracefieldstrue > > \switchtobodyfont[96pt] > > \def\FS#1{\framed[width=4cm,height=4cm,strut=no]{\red\bf#1}}% > > \definesymbol [empty] [] > > \definesymbol [one] [\FS{1}] > \definesymbol [two] [\FS{2}] > \definesymbol [three] [\FS{3}] > \definesymbol [four] [\FS{4}] > \definesymbol [five] [\FS{5}] > > > \setupfield[interaction] > [width=4cm,height=4cm, > % frame=off, > framecolor=blue, > offset=none,% default offset causes different positioning of walk button and fieldstack > clickin=JS(Walk_Field{sequence})] > > \definefield[Walk][check][interaction][empty][empty] > > > \definefieldstack[sequence] > [one,two,three,four,five] > [frame=off, > offset=none,% default offset causes different positioning of walk button and fieldstack > clickin=JS(Walk_Field{sequence})] ^^^^ oeps, this one is obsolete > > > \defineproperty[interaction][layer][title=walkfield, state=start] > > > \vbox{\forgetall > \nointerlineskip\smashedvbox{\fieldstack[sequence]}% > % > \startproperty[interaction]% > \nointerlineskip\field[Walk] > \stopproperty% > } > > \blank[2cm] > \showfields > > \stoptext > > > %%% Local Variables: > %%% mode: context > %%% TeX-master: "" > %%% End: > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > ntg-context mailing list > ntg-context@ntg.nl > http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-04-22 20:09 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2006-04-18 9:09 Fieldstack Walk Michal Kvasnička 2006-04-18 9:28 ` Peter Rolf [not found] ` <4444B1C9.1090109@econ.muni.cz> 2006-04-18 10:18 ` Peter Rolf [not found] ` <4444B966.5020108@gmx.net> 2006-04-18 10:39 ` Michal Kvasnička 2006-04-18 11:55 ` Peter Rolf 2006-04-18 21:35 ` Peter Rolf 2006-04-18 22:03 ` Sanjoy Mahajan 2006-04-19 8:41 ` Peter Rolf 2006-04-19 11:49 ` Sanjoy Mahajan 2006-04-22 20:01 ` Peter Rolf 2006-04-22 20:09 ` Peter Rolf
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).