From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/27345 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Renaud AUBIN Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: ConTeXt + asymptote Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:49:55 +0200 Message-ID: <4448FF23.6000801@nibua-r.org> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0861828023==" X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1145634625 11649 80.91.229.2 (21 Apr 2006 15:50:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 15:50:25 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Fri Apr 21 17:50:25 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FWxta-0002Yc-L3 for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:50:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4214212783; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:50:10 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 30769-02; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:50:04 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D69C12793; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:50:04 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 647B81279B for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:50:02 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 30772-04-6 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:50:01 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from 27.mail-out.ovh.net (27.mail-out.ovh.net [213.186.38.137]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 1941F12783 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:50:00 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: (qmail 15305 invoked by uid 503); 21 Apr 2006 15:51:13 -0000 Original-Received: from b7.ovh.net (HELO mail151.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.57) by 27.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 21 Apr 2006 15:51:13 -0000 Original-Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queue-out) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 21 Apr 2006 15:49:59 -0000 Original-Received: from mail151.ha.ovh.net (10.0.50.151) by mail151.ha.ovh.net with SMTP; 21 Apr 2006 15:49:57 -0000 Original-Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queue-pre) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 21 Apr 2006 15:49:57 -0000 Original-Received: from d213-103-243-187.cust.tele2.fr (HELO ?192.168.78.10?) (aubin@nibua-r.org@213.103.243.187) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 21 Apr 2006 15:49:57 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: fr, en Original-To: ConTeXt Mailing List X-Ovh-Remote: 213.103.243.187 (d213-103-243-187.cust.tele2.fr) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-Spam-Check: fait|type 1&3|0.5|H 0.5 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:27345 Archived-At: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============0861828023== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040101050300050509090304" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040101050300050509090304 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi all, I like metapost but, according to the following mail (on the metapost ML): [metapost] MP vs. Asymptote I don't want to start a flame, but since someone posted a message some time ago mentioning Asymptote I got curious and I have to say that I was very impressed, even if I still have some problems with it. However, it seems a net improvement over MP, or not? Is there anyone with an informed opinion over Asymptote? Might Asymptote be the killer of MP? Cheers, (and always thanks for the help I got here now and then...) Maurizio _______________________________________________ metapost mailing list http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/metapost I wonder if someone has already tried to use asymptote with ConTeXt... IMHO, this doesn't seem obvious at all but I'm maybe wrong... Cheers Renaud --------------040101050300050509090304 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi all,

I like metapost but, according to the following mail (on the metapost ML):
 
[metapost] MP vs. Asymptote
I don't want to start a flame, but since someone posted a message some
time ago mentioning Asymptote I got curious and I have to say that I was
very impressed, even if I still have some problems with it. However, it
seems a net improvement over MP, or not? Is there anyone with an
informed opinion over Asymptote? Might Asymptote be the killer of MP?

Cheers,
(and always thanks for the help I got here now and then...)

Maurizio
_______________________________________________
metapost mailing list
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/metapost

I wonder if someone has already tried to use asymptote with ConTeXt... IMHO, this doesn't seem obvious at all but I'm maybe wrong...

Cheers

Renaud
--------------040101050300050509090304-- --===============0861828023== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context --===============0861828023==--