From: Taco Hoekwater <taco@elvenkind.com>
Subject: Re: ConTeXt + asymptote
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 09:52:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <444DD527.3080601@elvenkind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4448FF23.6000801@nibua-r.org>
I've posted this to the metapost list as well:
> I like metapost but, according to the following mail (on the metapost ML):
>
> [metapost] MP vs. Asymptote
> I don't want to start a flame, but since someone posted a message some
> time ago mentioning Asymptote I got curious and I have to say that I was
> very impressed, even if I still have some problems with it. However, it
> seems a net improvement over MP, or not? Is there anyone with an
> informed opinion over Asymptote? Might Asymptote be the killer of MP?
I am extremely interested in what you feel the improvements are
in Asymptote compared to MP, because it would give some clues
to the direction MP development should take.
I've been browsing a bit and I now know it has more of a C++ style
of doing things, but personally I don't see that as a big advantage.
Just like Laurence, I simply like the MF/MP 'feel'.
But more importantly, most of my illustrations depend heavily on
the equation solving capabilities of MetaPost. I got the impression
Asymptote cannot do that (but I may have missed something).
Cheers, Taco
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-25 7:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-21 15:49 Renaud AUBIN
2006-04-21 16:17 ` Renaud AUBIN
2006-04-21 16:45 ` Hans Hagen
2006-04-21 18:29 ` Jilani Khaldi
2006-04-21 18:52 ` Renaud AUBIN
2006-04-21 19:11 ` Hans Hagen
2006-04-21 19:13 ` Hans Hagen
2006-04-21 19:25 ` Renaud AUBIN
2006-04-22 8:38 ` Hans Hagen
2006-04-22 9:16 ` andrea valle
2006-04-21 19:10 ` Hans Hagen
2006-04-21 19:20 ` Renaud AUBIN
2006-04-21 19:52 ` Hans Hagen
2006-04-23 18:51 ` Renaud AUBIN
2006-04-23 20:28 ` Hans Hagen
2006-04-23 21:02 ` Renaud AUBIN
2006-04-23 21:50 ` Hans Hagen
2006-04-23 22:33 ` Renaud AUBIN
2006-04-24 0:54 ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2006-04-24 7:33 ` Hans Hagen
2006-04-25 4:36 ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2006-04-25 7:04 ` Hans Hagen
2006-04-25 8:02 ` Taco Hoekwater
2006-04-25 15:17 ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2006-04-21 20:00 ` ConTeXt +Tioga Jilani Khaldi
2006-04-21 20:49 ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2006-04-22 7:47 ` Hans Hagen
2006-04-22 9:47 ` Taco Hoekwater
2006-04-22 12:12 ` Jilani Khaldi
2006-04-22 15:56 ` andrea valle
2006-04-21 19:37 ` ConTeXt + asymptote Sanjoy Mahajan
2006-04-21 23:30 ` Mojca Miklavec
2006-04-25 7:52 ` Taco Hoekwater [this message]
2006-06-29 13:40 John Bowman
2006-06-29 18:05 ` Hans Hagen
2006-06-30 1:12 ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2006-06-30 8:16 ` Hans Hagen
2006-10-15 5:04 John Bowman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=444DD527.3080601@elvenkind.com \
--to=taco@elvenkind.com \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).