* narrower
@ 2006-05-15 23:29 frantisek holop
2006-05-16 8:45 ` narrower Taco Hoekwater
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: frantisek holop @ 2006-05-15 23:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
hi there,
i am trying to make a document in the form of a movie script
ACTOR
hi there
ACTRESS
and hi over there
i thought this would work nicely:
\startnarrower
\midaligned{\sc actor}
hi there
\stopnarrower
but the default narrowness is not good for me.
but setupnarrower doesn't seem to work for me.
here's a minimal example:
\setupnarrower [left=3cm, right=3cm]
\starttext
not narrower
\startnarrower
this is narrower
\stopnarrower
\stoptext
also, i put the actor line inside the narrower to get rid of
the whitespace between \midaligned and \startnarrower, is there
a better way?
-f
--
today is a fine day for firm decisions. or is it?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: narrower
2006-05-15 23:29 narrower frantisek holop
@ 2006-05-16 8:45 ` Taco Hoekwater
2006-05-16 9:00 ` narrower frantisek holop
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Taco Hoekwater @ 2006-05-16 8:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
frantisek holop wrote:
>
> but the default narrowness is not good for me.
> but setupnarrower doesn't seem to work for me.
> here's a minimal example:
>
>
The use of narrower is a bit abnormal. Either use:
\setupnarrower[left=3cm, right=3cm]
\startnarrower[left,right]
or
\setupnarrower[middle=3cm]
\startnarrower % [middle] is default
Cheers, taco
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: narrower
2006-05-16 8:45 ` narrower Taco Hoekwater
@ 2006-05-16 9:00 ` frantisek holop
2006-05-16 9:35 ` narrower Taco Hoekwater
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: frantisek holop @ 2006-05-16 9:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
hmm, on Tue, May 16, 2006 at 10:45:32AM +0200, Taco Hoekwater said that
> The use of narrower is a bit abnormal. Either use:
>
> \setupnarrower[left=3cm, right=3cm]
> \startnarrower[left,right]
>
> or
>
> \setupnarrower[middle=3cm]
> \startnarrower % [middle] is default
thanks a lot.
is there a reason this was solved "abnormally"?
are there plans to make this more context-ish?
or is it confusing only for me?
-f
--
saint: a dead sinner revised and edited.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: narrower
2006-05-16 9:00 ` narrower frantisek holop
@ 2006-05-16 9:35 ` Taco Hoekwater
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Taco Hoekwater @ 2006-05-16 9:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
frantisek holop wrote:
> thanks a lot.
>
> is there a reason this was solved "abnormally"?
\startnarrower (\startsmaller in dutch) is one of the oldest
commands in ConTeXt. It predates the now-normal conventions
by a few years.
> are there plans to make this more context-ish?
Don't expect any changes to \startnarrower. But perhaps
a more predictable alternative could be added.
Cheers, Taco
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-05-16 9:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-05-15 23:29 narrower frantisek holop
2006-05-16 8:45 ` narrower Taco Hoekwater
2006-05-16 9:00 ` narrower frantisek holop
2006-05-16 9:35 ` narrower Taco Hoekwater
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).