Re: \bar missing in euler

[Adam Lindsay <atl@comp.lancs.ac.uk>]

Hans Hagen wrote:
> Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>> I do not know what is the equivalent of 'operators' family in context. 
>> Any idea how to pull them out of the text fonts?
>>   
> if this is only euler, we may use something 

I believe this is euler only. The other math fonts I have dug into have 
been "complete."

> euler:ec

Makes sense. I'll look at the new definitions you just sent.

On the "user" side, what do you imagine it would look like:
\definetypeface [e] [mm] [math] [euler] [euler] [encoding=ec]
   or
\definetypeface [e] [mm] [math] [euler] [euler] [encoding=euler:ec]
   or
\starttypescript [math,boldmath] [euler] [ec]   # with the first one
   \usemathcollection[euler:ec]
\stoptypescript

?

> otherwise we end up with all other math encodings being messed up 

Yes, and that's the last thing I'd want to happen because of euler support.
-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
  Adam T. Lindsay, Computing Dept.     atl@comp.lancs.ac.uk
  Lancaster University, InfoLab21        +44(0)1524/510.514
  Lancaster, LA1 4WA, UK             Fax:+44(0)1524/510.492
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-