From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/29554 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: ConTeXt and cmyk Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 10:57:39 +0200 Message-ID: <44C09703.8010207@wxs.nl> References: <44C07E84.7090806@nibua-r.org> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1153472333 475 80.91.229.2 (21 Jul 2006 08:58:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 08:58:53 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Fri Jul 21 10:58:41 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G3qpl-000076-0l for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 10:58:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB464128A5; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 10:58:07 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 06784-03-7; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 10:58:02 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34494127FC; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 10:58:02 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D05BA127FC for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 10:57:45 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 06784-03-6 for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 10:57:43 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mail.pragma-ade.net (dsl-083-247-100-017.solcon.nl [83.247.100.17]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A4301279E for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 10:57:40 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from [10.100.1.102] (unverified [10.100.1.102]) by controller-1 (SurgeMail 3.5b3) with ESMTP id 27699 for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 12:57:40 +0400 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users In-Reply-To: <44C07E84.7090806@nibua-r.org> X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com r=-274017400 X-Authenticated-User: hagen@controller-1 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:29554 Archived-At: Renaud AUBIN wrote: > Hi all, > > I have reproduced a logo http://www.uvsq.fr/guide/charte/index.html > (see attachment for the resulting metapost code). > What's the best method to define colors according to this web page ? > My understanding is: > - for printing, the use of > \setupcolors[cmyk=yes,mpcmyk=no,conversion=no] is the best, > - for display rendering, the use of > \setupcolors[cmyk=yes,mpcmyk=yes,conversion=yes] is the best. > > Am I right ? i nowadays always use the cmyk for screen too; acrobat is supposed to choose an appropriate 'paper equivalent' otherwise, a \setupcolors[cmyk=no,mpcmyk=no] should be ok (this will turn cmyk colors into rgb) Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------