From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/29638 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Renaud AUBIN Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: U3D (embedded 3D objects) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:15:23 +0200 Message-ID: <44C49DBB.8000209@nibua-r.org> References: <43DE005D.402@wxs.nl> <43DE91C0.6050204@wxs.nl> <1C444A13-5055-43C2-A2FD-02A043161F81@indiana.edu> <43DF3BA1.8060801@wxs.nl> <43E09677.40708@wxs.nl> <44C17CF6.9080905@nibua-r.org> <44C247CF.5040602@wxs.nl> <44C2C271.4000905@nibua-r.org> <44C4970D.1070406@wxs.nl> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1615478591==" X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1153736143 8881 80.91.229.2 (24 Jul 2006 10:15:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:15:43 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Mon Jul 24 12:15:42 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G4xTR-0005mq-DY for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:15:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C39B128D5; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:15:41 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 23417-01-3; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:15:35 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A32CC128D1; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:15:35 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA616128D1 for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:15:34 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 23417-01-2 for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:15:33 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from 42.mail-out.ovh.net (42.mail-out.ovh.net [213.251.189.42]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 521D7128CC for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:15:33 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: (qmail 30165 invoked by uid 503); 24 Jul 2006 10:15:26 -0000 Original-Received: from b6.ovh.net (HELO mail53.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.56) by 42.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 24 Jul 2006 10:15:26 -0000 Original-Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queue-out) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 24 Jul 2006 10:15:40 -0000 Original-Received: from d80-170-13-16.cust.tele2.fr (HELO ?192.168.78.10?) (aubin@nibua-r.org@80.170.13.16) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 24 Jul 2006 10:15:37 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: fr, en Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users In-Reply-To: <44C4970D.1070406@wxs.nl> X-Ovh-Remote: 80.170.13.16 (d80-170-13-16.cust.tele2.fr) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-Spam-Check: DONE|H 0.5/1.0/5.0/N X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:29638 Archived-At: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============1615478591== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000707000907090403050104" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000707000907090403050104 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hans Hagen a =E9crit : >my guess is that trying to reverse engineer latex code will cost me more= =20 >time that doing it directly the context way; the only thing that i need=20 >is the relevant annotation specs (someplace in the pdf manual) > >(in context such code ends up in the drivers and it needs to work well=20 >with the more complex annot stuff) > >Hans > =20 > See page 747 of PDFReference.pdf (1.6) Should I use \pdfannot ? I've never done that before so can you link me to an example (of the ConTeXt way) ? Renaud --------------000707000907090403050104 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hans Hagen a écrit :
my guess is that trying to reverse engineer latex code will cost me more 
time that doing it directly the context way; the only thing that i need 
is the relevant annotation specs (someplace in the pdf manual)

(in context such code ends up in the drivers and it needs to work well 
with the more complex annot stuff)

Hans
See page 747 of PDFReference.pdf (1.6)

Should I use \pdfannot ? I've never done that before so can you link me to an example (of the ConTeXt way) ?

Renaud

--------------000707000907090403050104-- --===============1615478591== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context --===============1615478591==--